From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eliezer Tamir Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: poll/select low latency socket support Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:12:24 +0300 Message-ID: <51C02478.7020708@linux.intel.com> References: <20130618085759.10941.15811.stgit@ladj378.jer.intel.com> <20130618085810.10941.55039.stgit@ladj378.jer.intel.com> <1371546510.3252.224.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Brandeburg , Don Skidmore , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Willem de Bruijn , Ben Hutchings , Andi Kleen , HPA , Eilon Greenstien , Or Gerlitz , Amir Vadai , Alex Rosenbaum , Avner Ben Hanoch , Or Kehati , sockperf-dev@googlegroups.com, Eliezer Tamir To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1371546510.3252.224.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 18/06/2013 12:08, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 11:58 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote: >> select/poll busy-poll support. >> > > >> */ >> -static inline u64 ll_end_time(struct sock *sk) >> +static inline u64 ll_sk_end_time(struct sock *sk) >> { >> - u64 end_time = ACCESS_ONCE(sk->sk_ll_usec); >> - >> - /* we don't mind a ~2.5% imprecision >> - * sk->sk_ll_usec is a u_int so this can't overflow >> - */ >> - end_time = (end_time << 10) + sched_clock(); >> + return (ACCESS_ONCE(sk->sk_ll_usec) << 10) + sched_clock(); >> +} >> > > This is the fourth time you try to introduce an overflow in this code. > > (same for ll_end_time()) sorry, Please review the rest of the patch to see if you have any other comments.