From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kaber@trash.net, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 8021q: fix vlan 0 inconsistencies
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:08:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C30CE2.5030803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371731078-12531-1-git-send-email-nikolay@redhat.com>
On 06/20/2013 02:24 PM, nikolay@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
>
> The first part of the patch stops the addition of VLAN 0 to bonding
> devices because we use an internal vlan_list to keep the added vlans and
> after that when checking if we're using vlans on the bond
> (bond_vlan_used) it evaluates to true always, which leads to different
> problems. Since this is intended for HW vlan filters, it's not needed
> for the bonding, and for its slaves it will still get added upon
> NETDEV_UP.
> The second part that does unconditional vlan_vid_del is needed because
> when we add vlan 0 to a bonding device, it can never be removed
> completely (it will always stay in the local vlan_list). Since there's
> refcounting, I don't think this will change the behaviour because if a
> real device is UP then vlan 0 will have at least refcnt == 1 so
> ndo_vlan_rx_kill_vid won't get called until the device is down, but in
> the bonding case we need it while the device is up so we can cleanup
> properly after vlan 0 removal.
> As an addition I'd like to say that I tried many different fixes of this
> issue from inside the bonding, but they all have shortcomings and fixing
> the root cause would be much better. For example I can't filter out vlan
> 0 in the bond's ndo_vlan_rx_add_vid because bond_has_this_ip() (and others)
> rely on being able to check the vlan devices on top through the local
> vlan_list. Also there's no way to differentiate between addition of vlan 0
> from vlan_device_event and from register_vlan_dev.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
In fact I think there's a deeper issue with vlan 0 because if you add it to any
device its refcount will only be incremented (unconditional vlan_vid_add in
register_vlan_dev) and never decremented. And this issue is also fixed by this
patch.
Nik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-20 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-20 12:24 [PATCH] 8021q: fix vlan 0 inconsistencies nikolay
2013-06-20 14:08 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2013-06-28 5:27 ` David Miller
2013-06-28 8:20 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-06-29 11:46 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C30CE2.5030803@redhat.com \
--to=nikolay@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).