From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ian Campbell" <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
"Wei Liu" <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Dion Kant" <g.w.kant@hunenet.nl>, <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netfront: pull on receive skb may need to happen earlier
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:47:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DBDC2802000078000E37E2@nat28.tlf.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373296938.4979.111.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
>>> On 08.07.13 at 17:22, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 15:20 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> Okay, so with that done (see below) Dion is now seeing the
>> WARN_ON_ONCE(delta < len) in skb_try_coalesce() triggering. Of
>> course, with it having crashed before, it's hard to tell whether the
>> triggering now is an effect of the patch, or just got unmasked by it.
>
> Please note this warning is not the sign of an error.
Thanks for pointing this out.
> It can be triggered because network stack (IP + TCP) had to reallocate
> skb->head to hold all the headers.
>
> pskb_may_pull() doesn't change skb->truesize, for various reasons, so we
> can have a situation where the warning triggers.
>
> For example, it can happen when drivers use a really small skb->head,
> like 64 bytes, as its not big enough to hold ethernet+IP+TCP headers.
We know from the crashes prior to the patch here that this is
exactly what is happening.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-09 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <8511913.uMAmUdIO30@eistomin.edss.local>
[not found] ` <20130517085923.GC14401@zion.uk.xensource.com>
[not found] ` <51D57C1F.8070909@hunenet.nl>
[not found] ` <20130704150137.GW7483@zion.uk.xensource.com>
2013-07-05 9:32 ` [PATCH] xen-netfront: pull on receive skb may need to happen earlier Jan Beulich
2013-07-05 14:53 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-07 1:10 ` David Miller
2013-07-08 9:59 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-08 12:16 ` Dion Kant
2013-07-08 12:41 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-08 14:20 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-07-08 15:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-09 7:47 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2013-07-08 15:48 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-09 6:52 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-09 16:51 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-10 6:58 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-10 10:04 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-10 10:46 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-10 12:50 ` Ian Campbell
2013-07-10 12:53 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-10 13:58 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-10 13:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 8:32 ` Wei Liu
2013-07-12 8:56 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-13 11:26 ` Dion Kant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DBDC2802000078000E37E2@nat28.tlf.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=g.w.kant@hunenet.nl \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox