Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: split rt_genid for ipv4 and ipv6

[Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com>]

On 2013年07月26日 02:13, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:47:12PM +0800, Fan Du wrote:
>> +/* For callers who don't really care about whether it's IPv4 or IPv6 */
>> +static inline void rt_genid_bump_all(struct net *net)
>> +{
>> +	atomic_inc(&net->ipv4.rt_genid);
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>> +	atomic_inc(&net->ipv6.rt_genid);
>> +#endif
>
> You could get away with the ifdef if you just do
> 	rt_genid_bump_ipv4(net);
> 	rt_genid_bump_ipv6(net);

Ok, will fix this.

>
> Somewhere something does break selinux:
>
>    CC      security/selinux/hooks.o
> In file included from security/selinux/hooks.c:93:0:
> security/selinux/include/xfrm.h: In function ‘selinux_xfrm_notify_policyload’:
> security/selinux/include/xfrm.h:54:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rt_genid_bump’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    rt_genid_bump(&init_net);
>    ^
> Seems like you have overlooked the rt_genid_bump in
> security/selinux/include/xfrm.h, which should be a rt_genid_bump_all
>

Thanks for report this, my side CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM is not set before. :(


> Off-topic:
> Is it correct that selinux_xfrm_notify_policyload only bumps genid for
> init_net?
>

This was introduced in ee8372dd1989287c5eedb69d44bac43f69e496f1
"xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion" by Nicolas.

I take a look at SELINUX xfrm part, my limited understanding SELINUX XFRM rule
should take global effect on all net name space in current implementation.

diff --git a/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h b/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h
index 65f67cb..4f72d2c 100644
--- a/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h
+++ b/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h
@@ -50,8 +50,14 @@ int selinux_xfrm_decode_session(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid, int ckall);

  static inline void selinux_xfrm_notify_policyload(void)
  {
+       struct net *net;
+
         atomic_inc(&flow_cache_genid);
-       rt_genid_bump(&init_net);
+       rtnl_lock();
+       for_each_net(net) {
+               rt_genid_bump_all(net);
+       }
+       rtnl_unlock();
  }
  #else
  static inline int selinux_xfrm_enabled(void)


Let me know if I miss something inside it. Thanks.


> Otherwise I don't see any problems arising from this patch because of
> the rt_genid split.
>
> Greetings,
>
>    Hannes
>
>

-- 
浮沉随浪只记今朝笑

--fan