netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Amir Vadai <amirv@mellanox.com>,
	tomk@rgmadvisors.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: Add low-latency/polling support for UDP multicast
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:46:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52035AD9.30703@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375906946.4004.45.camel@edumazet-glaptop>


On 07/08/2013 23:22, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 14:51 -0500, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
>> Set the napi id for each socket in the multicast path to enable
>> low-latency/polling support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com>
>> ---
>> v2 include ipv6 support
> 
> This might help your workload, but I doubt it is generic enough.
> 
> One UDP socket is supposed to receive traffic from many endpoints,
> so we have no guarantee all the received traffic will end on a single RX
> queue on the NIC.
> 
> That's the same logic than RFS here.
> 
> sk_mark_napi_id() in UDP are wrong IMHO.
> 
> It should be guarded by the following test in  
> __udp_queue_rcv_skb()
> 
> if (inet_sk(sk)->inet_daddr) {
>     sock_rps_save_rxhash(sk, skb);
>     sk_mark_napi_id(sk, skb);
> }
> 
> (To occur only for connected UDP sockets, where we are 100% sure all
> packets will use this same rxhash/rx queue)

This would also be safe if there is only one NIC and said NIC was
programmed to always place this socket's data on the same queue.

I don't have a good suggestion on how to detect this.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-08  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-05 21:22 low latency/busy poll feedback and bugs Shawn Bohrer
2013-08-05 22:16 ` [PATCH net-next] net: Add low-latency/polling support for UDP multicast Shawn Bohrer
2013-08-06  7:13   ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-08-06 19:51     ` [PATCH v2 " Shawn Bohrer
2013-08-07 20:22       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-08  8:46         ` Eliezer Tamir [this message]
2013-08-08 23:55           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-11  7:59             ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-08-06  7:41 ` low latency/busy poll feedback and bugs Eliezer Tamir
2013-08-06 18:08   ` Shawn Bohrer
2013-08-06 18:25     ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-08-07 20:05       ` Ben Hutchings
2013-08-07 20:23         ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-07 23:41           ` David Miller
2013-08-06 20:39   ` Or Gerlitz
2013-08-06 21:02     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-06 12:15 ` Amir Vadai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52035AD9.30703@linux.intel.com \
    --to=eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=amirv@mellanox.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com \
    --cc=tomk@rgmadvisors.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).