From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
To: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/6] bonding: add rcu to vlan_uses_dev() and make bond_vlan_used() use it
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:06:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5204CD4B.5080401@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375981079-2936-2-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com>
On 08/08/2013 06:57 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> RFC -> v1: don't add vlan_uses_dev_rcu() and change vlan_uses_dev() instead
> v1 -> v2: remove the ASSERT_RTNL(), cause we can now be called under rcu.
>
> Currently, bond_vlan_used() looks for any vlan, including the pseudo-vlan
> id 0, and always returns true if 8021q is loaded. This creates several bad
> situations - some warnings in __bond_release_one() because it thinks that
> we still have vlans while removing, sending LB packets with vlan id 0 and,
> possibly, other caused by vlan id 0.
>
> Fix it by changing vlan_uses_dev() to use rcu_dereference_rtnl() instead of
> rtnl_dereference(), and thus it can already be used in bond_vlan_used()
> under rcu_read_lock().
>
> By the time vlan_uses_dev() returns we cannot be sure if there were no
> vlans added/removed, so it's basicly an optimization function.
>
> Also, use the vlan_uses_dev() in __bond_release_one() cause the rtnl lock
> is held there.
>
> For this call to be visible in bonding.h, add include <linux/if_vlan.h>,
> and also remove it from any other bonding file, cause they all include
> bonding.h, and thus linux/if_vlan.h.
>
> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
> CC: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> CC: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 1 -
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 3 +--
> drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 10 +++++++++-
> net/8021q/vlan_core.c | 5 ++---
> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> index 3a5db7b..2684329 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@
> #include <linux/if_arp.h>
> #include <linux/if_ether.h>
> #include <linux/if_bonding.h>
> -#include <linux/if_vlan.h>
> #include <linux/in.h>
> #include <net/ipx.h>
> #include <net/arp.h>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 4264a76..9d1045d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@
> #include <net/arp.h>
> #include <linux/mii.h>
> #include <linux/ethtool.h>
> -#include <linux/if_vlan.h>
> #include <linux/if_bonding.h>
> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
> #include <linux/preempt.h>
> @@ -1953,7 +1952,7 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
> bond_set_carrier(bond);
> eth_hw_addr_random(bond_dev);
>
> - if (bond_vlan_used(bond)) {
> + if (vlan_uses_dev(bond_dev)) {
> pr_warning("%s: Warning: clearing HW address of %s while it still has VLANs.\n",
> bond_dev->name, bond_dev->name);
> pr_warning("%s: When re-adding slaves, make sure the bond's HW address matches its VLANs'.\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
> index 4bf52d5..9c4539e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include <linux/netpoll.h>
> #include <linux/inetdevice.h>
> #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/if_vlan.h>
> #include "bond_3ad.h"
> #include "bond_alb.h"
>
> @@ -267,9 +268,16 @@ struct bonding {
> #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
> };
>
> +/* use vlan_uses_dev() if under rtnl */
Small nitpick - I don't think this comment is necessary as both calls now reduce
to vlan_uses_dev() and can be used interchangeably, maybe it's better to stick
to bond_vlan_used() just for consistency everywhere.
Anyway, I'm okay with this version as well:
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-09 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-08 16:57 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] bonding: remove bond->vlan_list Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-08 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/6] bonding: add rcu to vlan_uses_dev() and make bond_vlan_used() use it Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-09 11:06 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2013-08-09 11:11 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-08 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/6] vlan: add __vlan_find_dev_next() Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-09 7:30 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-09 11:07 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-08-14 15:28 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-08 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/6] bonding: make bond_alb use 8021q's dev->vlan_info instead of vlan_list Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-09 11:13 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-08-09 11:24 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-08 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 4/6] bonding: convert bond_has_this_ip to use bond->dev->vlan_info Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-08 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 5/6] bonding: convert bond_arp_send_all " Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-09 11:42 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-08-08 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 6/6] bonding: remove unused bond->vlan_list Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-09 11:44 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-08-26 16:31 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] bonding: remove bond->vlan_list Veaceslav Falico
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-08-08 10:21 [PATCH v1 net-next 1/6] bonding: add rcu to vlan_uses_dev() and make bond_vlan_used() use it Veaceslav Falico
2013-08-08 10:39 ` [PATCH v2 " Veaceslav Falico
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5204CD4B.5080401@redhat.com \
--to=nikolay@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).