From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sctp: sctp_set_owner_w: fix panic during skb orphaning
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 22:47:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52055564.50500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130809.133720.232424253997869104.davem@davemloft.net>
On 08/09/2013 10:37 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 12:42:01 +0200
>
>> This patch fixes the following triggered bug ...
> ...
>> ... that is triggered after commit 376c7311b ("net: add a temporary sanity
>> check in skb_orphan()"). What is happening is that we call sctp_set_owner_w()
>> for chunks in the SCTP output path from sctp_sendmsg(). Such chunks eventually
>> origin from constructors like sctp_make_chunk() where skb->sk = sk is being
>> set for socket accounting. Doing a git grep -n "skb->sk" net/sctp/ shows that
>> also in other places the socket pointer is being set, before issuing a
>> SCTP_CMD_SEND_PKT command and the like. Since SCTP is doing it's own memory
>> accounting anyway and has its own skb destructor functions, we should
>> customize sctp_set_owner_w() and call skb_orphan() if we set a different
>> owner of the skb than the current one in order to properly call their
>> destructor function, but not run into a panic due to our non-exisiting one as
>> we set sctp_wfree() destructor right after that. Otherwise, we can just skip
>> orphaning and reassignment to the very same socket and only set the destructor
>> handler.
>
> This debugging check is exactly trying to catch what SCTP is doing,
> setting skb->sk without also setting the destructor.
>
> I would much rather see you reorganize and fix SCTP to behave properly
> rather than coding up a check which is essentially "if skb_orphan() bug
> won't trigger, call it" That defeats the whole purpose of the check.
Ok, will try to come up with a patch next week. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-09 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-07 10:42 [PATCH net-next] net: sctp: sctp_set_owner_w: fix panic during skb orphaning Daniel Borkmann
2013-08-08 5:57 ` Neil Horman
2013-08-09 20:37 ` David Miller
2013-08-09 20:47 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2013-08-09 21:58 ` [PATCH] net: sctp: fix panic during skb_orphan() Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-09 23:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-10 0:39 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-10 1:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-10 1:34 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-10 2:05 ` [PATCH net-next] net: sctp: Add rudimentary infrastructure to account for control chunks Vlad Yasevich
2013-08-13 22:04 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52055564.50500@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).