From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ding Tianhong Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v4] ipv6: do not disable temp_address when reaching max_address Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 08:48:44 +0800 Message-ID: <520D76EC.6000205@huawei.com> References: <520B48AE.8050103@huawei.com> <20130814101511.GC16264@order.stressinduktion.org> <520C241A.2030708@huawei.com> <20130815012457.GD13066@order.stressinduktion.org> <520C3A13.3060106@huawei.com> <20130815173603.GA30746@order.stressinduktion.org> <20130815190754.GB30746@order.stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , James Morris , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Patrick McHardy , Jon Maloy , Eric Dumazet , Netdev , , Return-path: Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.64]:6580 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751637Ab3HPAtf (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:49:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130815190754.GB30746@order.stressinduktion.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2013/8/16 3:07, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 07:36:03PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: >> Now we have to check why these addresses don't go out of tentative state. > > Just looked at it. flood_router26 just emits pretty high values for > RetransTime: > > 21:05:52.050159 IP6 (hlim 255, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 192) fe80::c:2a47:1360:1101 > ff02::1: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, router advertisement, length 192 > hop limit 255, Flags [none], pref high, router lifetime 65535s, reachable time 16384000ms, retrans time 1966080ms > mtu option (5), length 8 (1): 1500 > 0x0000: 0000 0000 05dc > > We are completly in spec here. Just DAD needs a lot of time to finish. > > Greetings, > > Hannes > > Great job, more and more close to the truth, let's find a better way to finish it. > . >