netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: boris brezillon <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] phylib: mdio: handle register/unregister/register sequence
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:24:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <521610FE.7080807@overkiz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGVrzcYTudGg-NH+REL3vDe6a5s6bkXRQH1-PFFs-HNEnJ-rTw@mail.gmail.com>

On 22/08/2013 15:15, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 2013/8/22 boris brezillon <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>:
>> Hello Florian,
>>
>> Thanks for your answer.
>>
>>
>> On 22/08/2013 14:43, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Hello Boris,
>>>
>>> 2013/8/22 Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> This patch is a proposal to support the register/unregister/register
>>>> sequence on a given mdio bus.
>>>>
>>>> I use the register/unregister/register sequence to add a fallback when
>>>> the
>>>> of_mdiobus_register (this function calls mdiobus_register with phy_mask
>>>> set to ~0) does not register any phy device (because the device tree does
>>>> not define any phy).
>>>> In this case I call mdiobus_unregister and then call mdiobus_register
>>>> with
>>>> a phy_mask set to 0 to trigger a full mdio bus scan.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure this is the right way to do it (this is why I added RFC in
>>>> the
>>>> subject).
>>>>
>>>> Could someone help me figuring out what I should use to implement my
>>>> fallback ?
>>>>
>>>> 1) use the register/unregister/register sequence
>>>> 2) reimplement the "for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_ADDR; i++)" mdiobus_scan loop
>>> I think solution 2 is nicer, in that case, would it be enough in your
>>> case to export a function called mdiobus_scan()? You could call at a
>>> time you know PHY devices have a chance of having been probed?
>> mdiobus_scan is already exported:
>> struct phy_device *mdiobus_scan(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr);
>>
>> This function scans the presence of a phy device at a given address.
>>
>> What I need is a loop which scan all the possible address on the given
>> mdio bus:
>>
>> struct phy_device *mdiobus_full_scan(struct mii_bus *bus)
>> {
>>      int i;
>>      for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_ADDR; i++) {
>>          if ((bus->phy_mask & (1 << i)) == 0) {
>>              struct phy_device *phydev;
>>
>>              phydev = mdiobus_scan(bus, i);
>>              if (IS_ERR(phydev)) {
>>                  err = PTR_ERR(phydev);
>>                  goto error;
>>              }
>>          }
>>      }
>>      return 0;
>>
>> error:
>>      while (--i >= 0) {
>>
>>          if (bus->phy_map[i])
>>              device_unregister(&bus->phy_map[i]->dev);
>>      }
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mdiobus_full_scan);
>>
>> Since I am the only one who need this kind of functionnality right now, I'm
>> not sure
>> this is a good idea to export a new function.
> A possible other use case for this full-scan is when you do not detect
> a PHY connected to your MDIO bus, and that you did not register a
> fixed PHY early enough for it to have been scanned by the fixed MDIO
> bus emulation. In that case the driver may:
>
> - scan hardware MDIO bus
> - do not find any PHY, register a fixed PHY
> - trigger a fixed MDIO bus full-rescan
> - attach to the discovered fixed PHY
>
> this is something currently done by the TI CPMAC driver in
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpmac.c (altough fixed_phy_add() is called
> from platform code).
>

Okay, then we should consider this option.

>> This behaviour may be implemented in the of_mdiobus_register function:
>> when no dt phy node are found in the mdio bus dt node, we could launch a
>> full
>> scan.
>>
>> What do you think ?
> There is an existing kind of "autoscan" feature in
> drivers/of/of_mdio.c, starting with the second foreach_child_node()
> loop, so maybe that specific part could be exported and would achieve
> what you are looking for? It relies on the Ethernet PHY nodes to be
> attached to the MDIO bus node, but I assume this is what ultimately
> happens in your case as well?

The second foreach_child_node loop only registers the dt phy nodes
which does not define any reg property (automatic address asssignement ?).

Indeed, what I need is a fallback when the device tree does not define 
any phy
device (for old device tree backward compatibility).

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-22 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-22 12:33 [RFC PATCH] phylib: mdio: handle register/unregister/register sequence Boris BREZILLON
2013-08-22 12:34 ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-08-22 12:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-08-22 13:05   ` boris brezillon
2013-08-22 13:15     ` Florian Fainelli
2013-08-22 13:24       ` boris brezillon [this message]
2013-08-22 13:14 ` boris brezillon
2013-08-22 15:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-22 15:38   ` boris brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=521610FE.7080807@overkiz.com \
    --to=b.brezillon@overkiz.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).