netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: boris brezillon <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] phylib: mdio: handle register/unregister/register sequence
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:38:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52163076.2010501@overkiz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130822152757.GA23163@kroah.com>

On 22/08/2013 17:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:33:56PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This patch is a proposal to support the register/unregister/register
>> sequence on a given mdio bus.
>>
>> I use the register/unregister/register sequence to add a fallback when the
>> of_mdiobus_register (this function calls mdiobus_register with phy_mask
>> set to ~0) does not register any phy device (because the device tree does
>> not define any phy).
>> In this case I call mdiobus_unregister and then call mdiobus_register with
>> a phy_mask set to 0 to trigger a full mdio bus scan.
>>
>> I'm not sure this is the right way to do it (this is why I added RFC in the
>> subject).
>>
>> Could someone help me figuring out what I should use to implement my fallback ?
>>
>> 1) use the register/unregister/register sequence
> That will not work.  Well, you might think it would work, but then
> things randomly start breaking later on.  Try it with the
> KOBJECT_DELAYED_DESTROY build option in linux-next, and watch things go
> "boom" :)
>
> The rule is, you should never register a kobject/struct device that you
> have previously unregistered before, as you really don't know if
> unregistering has finished or not.

Thanks for your answer.

>
> sorry,
>
> greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2013-08-22 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-22 12:33 [RFC PATCH] phylib: mdio: handle register/unregister/register sequence Boris BREZILLON
2013-08-22 12:34 ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-08-22 12:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-08-22 13:05   ` boris brezillon
2013-08-22 13:15     ` Florian Fainelli
2013-08-22 13:24       ` boris brezillon
2013-08-22 13:14 ` boris brezillon
2013-08-22 15:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-22 15:38   ` boris brezillon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52163076.2010501@overkiz.com \
    --to=b.brezillon@overkiz.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).