From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mugunthan V N Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] cpsw: support for control module register Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 01:08:56 +0530 Message-ID: <5217BA50.6050609@ti.com> References: <1377286330-29663-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, d-gerlach@ti.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, nsekhar@ti.com, vaibhav.bedia@ti.com, bcousson@baylibre.com, ujhelyi.m@gmail.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Daniel Mack Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1377286330-29663-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Saturday 24 August 2013 01:02 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: > Hi, > > this is the 6th version of my patch set, the version history is below. > > Note that for personal reasons, I won't be able to work on that patch > set for two weeks, starting from a few hours from now. If there are any > more objections or comments, I'll catch up after that period. Or if > anyone wants to make minor changes to my patches and resubmit them, > I'd also be fine with that :) > > The compatibility discussion is still ongoing, but I'd rather submit > what I got until now, and I'm also still convinced that having > ti,am3352-cpsw is the best we can do. > > > Thanks, > Daniel > > v5 -> v6: > * re-add code to fail if 3rd memory region is given but invalid > * added Mugunthan's ack on all patches except the one that adds > ti,am3352-cpsw > * remove parens around integer constants I am also in your favour of adding ti,am3352-cpsw, but lets get other comment. You can add my ack to that patch also if you are submitting another version. Regards Mugunthan V N