From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Mack Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] cpsw: support for control module register Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 21:41:32 +0200 Message-ID: <5217BAEC.8060602@gmail.com> References: <1377286330-29663-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> <5217BA50.6050609@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bcousson@baylibre.com, nsekhar@ti.com, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, davem@davemloft.net, ujhelyi.m@gmail.com, vaibhav.bedia@ti.com, d-gerlach@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org To: Mugunthan V N Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]:62788 "EHLO mail-ee0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754474Ab3HWTlg (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:41:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5217BA50.6050609@ti.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 23.08.2013 21:38, Mugunthan V N wrote: > On Saturday 24 August 2013 01:02 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: >> v5 -> v6: >> * re-add code to fail if 3rd memory region is given but invalid >> * added Mugunthan's ack on all patches except the one that adds >> ti,am3352-cpsw >> * remove parens around integer constants > I am also in your favour of adding ti,am3352-cpsw, but lets get other > comment. You can add my ack to that patch also if you are submitting > another version. I don't think I'll have a chance to do that before I'm AFK for a while :) That's also the only reason why I sent a v6 already. I would have normally waited for that discussion to settle of course. But as I said: I'd be fine if anyone adds another patch on top or amends mine. Thanks for the reviews again, everyone! Daniel