From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] bonding: Patchset for rcu use in bonding
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:37:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521FF755.6050306@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521F5AA3.4030105@redhat.com>
On 2013/8/29 22:28, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 08/28/2013 06:20 AM, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> The Patch Set convert the xmit of 3ad and alb mode to use rcu lock.
>> replace and add more rcu list function.
>> fix a bug to protect bonding_store_xmit_hash().
>>
>> I test well and no problems found till now.
>>
>> Ding Tianhong (3):
>> Wang Yufen (1):
>> Yang Yingliang (1):
>> bonding: simplify and use RCU protection for 3ad xmit path
>> bonding: replace read_lock to rcu_read_lock for
>> bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info()
>> bonding: add rtnl lock for bonding_store_xmit_hash
>> bonding: restructure and simplify bond_for_each_slave_next()
>> bonding: use RCU protection for alb xmit path
>>
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 35 +++++++++++++++-------------------
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 23 ++++++++++------------
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 ++----
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c | 4 ++++
>> drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 5 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>
> Thanks for the work, I was on vacation and travelling after my initial RCU
> conversion so I got a little behind with these conversions, my idea was quite
> different :-)
> Anyway, I'd also appreciate some benchmarks, also some more information on what
> type of testing did you run ?
> I've given some preliminary comments to the patches, I'll have to think more
> about them in this form.
>
> Cheers,
> Nik
>
> .
It looks like a wonderful vocation :).
I focus on the 3ad and alb mode, because the modify was manly for xmit, so my test environment was consist of 4 Intel82599 10G card, and use mode lacp ,alb.
I use iperf to test, after the patch, the performance was a little better and no problem
occurs.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-30 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-28 4:20 [PATCH 0/5] bonding: Patchset for rcu use in bonding Ding Tianhong
2013-08-29 14:28 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-08-30 1:37 ` Ding Tianhong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521FF755.6050306@huawei.com \
--to=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@redhat.com \
--cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).