From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for Renesys H8/300 architecture Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 06:56:45 -0700 Message-ID: <5221F61D.60009@roeck-us.net> References: <1377880842-6835-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <20130830184611.GA27455@spo001.leaseweb.com> <20130830191146.GA12090@roeck-us.net> <20130830193740.GA13101@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Yoshinori Sato , Linus Torvalds , Wim Van Sebroeck , Linux Kernel Mailing List , IDE-ML , Network Development , Linux Watchdog Mailing List , "David S. Miller" , Al Viro , Eric Paris , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiang Liu , David Howells , Thomas Gleixner , Stephen Rothwell To: Geert Uytterhoeven Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 08/30/2013 11:44 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:14:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> >>>> I would not mind if Linus would agree to pull it right away for 3.12, >>>> but that seems to be a bit on the fast side. >>> >>> I'm ok with code deletion patches, I don't think that would be a >>> problem. I didn't check them, but I assume this is all literally just >>> removing code that is conditional on h8/300 config options? >>> >> Yes. >> >> I found a couple more since I sent the series, but nothing significant. >> >> What is your preference - keep it until 3.13, or prepare it now and send you >> a pull request for 3.12 ? > > It would be nice to check with Sato-san, who wanted to attend Kernel > Summit as a hobbyist architecture maintainer, and see what are his plans > and opinions. > Yes, of course. My bad that my send script dropped him of all people from the original e-mail :(. I fixed that in version 2. Guenter