From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv6: Don't depend on per socket memory for neighbour discovery messages
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 11:19:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52261A12.3060203@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e4600dac657e1160da7a5e7758dcb973b616a10e.1378207925.git.tgraf@suug.ch>
On 09/03/2013 05:37 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> Allocating skbs when sending out neighbour discovery messages
> currently uses sock_alloc_send_skb() based on a per net namespace
> socket and thus share a socket wmem buffer space.
>
> If a netdevice is temporarily unable to transmit due to carrier
> loss or for other reasons, the queued up ndisc messages will cosnume
> all of the wmem space and will thus prevent from any more skbs to
> be allocated even for netdevices that are able to transmit packets.
>
> The number of neighbour discovery messages sent is very limited,
> use of alloc_skb() bypasses the socket wmem buffer size enforcement
> while the manual call to skb_set_owner_w() maintains the socket
> reference needed for the IPv6 output path.
>
> This patch has orginally been posted by Eric Dumazet in a modified
> form.
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Although I do note something slightly odd:
next-20130830 had an issue, and reverting V1 of this patch solved it.
However, in next-20130903, if I revert the revert of V1 of this patch, I
don't see any issue; it appears that the problem was some interaction
between V1 of this patch and something else in next-20130830.
Either way, this patch doesn't seem to introduce any issue when applied
on top of either next-20130830 with V1 reverted, or on top of
next-20130903, so it's fine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-03 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-03 11:37 [PATCH v2] ipv6: Don't depend on per socket memory for neighbour discovery messages Thomas Graf
2013-09-03 11:56 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-09-03 12:11 ` Thomas Graf
2013-09-03 12:18 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-09-03 17:19 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-09-03 17:27 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-09-03 17:42 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-03 17:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-09-03 18:03 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-03 18:23 ` Thomas Graf
2013-09-03 18:30 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-09-03 22:43 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-09-04 18:41 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52261A12.3060203@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox