From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] pkt_sched: fq: Fair Queue packet scheduler
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 13:26:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5226C4A0.6040709@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377816595.8277.54.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On 08/30/2013 06:49 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>
> - Uses perfect flow match (not stochastic hash like SFQ/FQ_codel)
> - Uses the new_flow/old_flow separation from FQ_codel
> - New flows get an initial credit allowing IW10 without added delay.
> - Special FIFO queue for high prio packets (no need for PRIO + FQ)
> - Uses a hash table of RB trees to locate the flows at enqueue() time
> - Smart on demand gc (at enqueue() time, RB tree lookup evicts old
> unused flows)
> - Dynamic memory allocations.
> - Designed to allow millions of concurrent flows per Qdisc.
> - Small memory footprint : ~8K per Qdisc, and 104 bytes per flow.
> - Single high resolution timer for throttled flows (if any).
> - One RB tree to link throttled flows.
> - Ability to have a max rate per flow. We might add a socket option
> to add per socket limitation.
>
> Attempts have been made to add TCP pacing in TCP stack, but this
> seems to add complex code to an already complex stack.
>
> TCP pacing is welcomed for flows having idle times, as the cwnd
> permits TCP stack to queue a possibly large number of packets.
>
[...]
>
> FQ gets a bunch of tunables as :
>
> limit : max number of packets on whole Qdisc (default 10000)
>
> flow_limit : max number of packets per flow (default 100)
>
> quantum : the credit per RR round (default is 2 MTU)
>
> initial_quantum : initial credit for new flows (default is 10 MTU)
>
> maxrate : max per flow rate (default : unlimited)
>
> buckets : number of RB trees (default : 1024) in hash table.
> (consumes 8 bytes per bucket)
>
> [no]pacing : disable/enable pacing (default is enable)
>
> All of them can be changed on a live qdisc.
>
> $ tc qd add dev eth0 root fq help
> Usage: ... fq [ limit PACKETS ] [ flow_limit PACKETS ]
> [ quantum BYTES ] [ initial_quantum BYTES ]
> [ maxrate RATE ] [ buckets NUMBER ]
> [ [no]pacing ]
>
> $ tc -s -d qd
> qdisc fq 8002: dev eth0 root refcnt 32 limit 10000p flow_limit 100p buckets 256 quantum 3028 initial_quantum 15140
> Sent 216532416 bytes 148395 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 14)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 14
> 511 flows, 511 inactive, 0 throttled
> 110 gc, 0 highprio, 0 retrans, 1143 throttled, 0 flows_plimit
>
>
> [1] Except if initial srtt is overestimated, as if using
> cached srtt in tcp metrics. We'll provide a fix for this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
> Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
> ---
> v2: added initial_quantum support
I see both degradation and jitter when using fq with virtio-net. Guest
to guest performance drops from 8Gb/s to 3Gb/s-7Gb/s. Guest to local
host drops from 8Gb/s to 4Gb/s-6Gb/s. Guest to external host with ixgbe
drops from 9Gb/s to 7Gb/s
I didn't meet the issue when using sfq or disabling pacing.
So it looks like it was caused by the inaccuracy and jitter of the
pacing estimation in a virt guest?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-04 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-29 22:49 [PATCH v2 net-next] pkt_sched: fq: Fair Queue packet scheduler Eric Dumazet
2013-08-30 1:47 ` David Miller
2013-08-30 2:30 ` [PATCH iproute2] " Eric Dumazet
2013-09-03 15:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-09-04 5:26 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2013-09-04 5:59 ` [PATCH v2 net-next] " Eric Dumazet
2013-09-04 6:30 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-04 10:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-09-04 11:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-09-04 11:59 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-09-05 3:39 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-05 0:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-09-05 1:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-09-05 3:43 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-05 3:34 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-05 3:07 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-05 3:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-09-05 5:16 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5226C4A0.6040709@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).