From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] pkt_sched: fq: Fair Queue packet scheduler
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 13:59:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5227209F.4060708@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378294029.7360.92.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On 09/04/2013 01:27 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 03:30 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 14:30 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>>> And tcpdump would certainly help ;)
>>>
>>> See attachment.
>>>
>>
>> Nothing obvious on tcpdump (only that lot of frames are missing)
>>
>> 1) Are you capturing part of the payload only (like tcpdump -s 128)
>>
>> 2) What is the setup.
>>
>> 3) tc -s -d qdisc
>
> If you use FQ in the guest, then it could be that high resolution timers
> have high latency ?
Probably they internally switch to a lower resolution clock event source if
there's no hardware support available:
The [source event] management layer provides interfaces for hrtimers to
implement high resolution timers [...] [and it] supports these more advanced
functions only when appropriate clock event sources have been registered,
otherwise the traditional periodic tick based behaviour is retained. [1]
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2006/ols2006v1-pages-333-346.pdf
> So FQ arms short timers, but effective duration could be much longer.
>
> Here I get a smooth latency of up to ~3 us
>
> lpq83:~# ./netperf -H lpq84 ; ./tc -s -d qd ; dmesg | tail -n1
> MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to lpq84.prod.google.com () port 0 AF_INET
> Recv Send Send
> Socket Socket Message Elapsed
> Size Size Size Time Throughput
> bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
>
> 87380 16384 16384 10.00 9410.82
> qdisc fq 8005: dev eth0 root refcnt 32 limit 10000p flow_limit 100p buckets 1024 quantum 3028 initial_quantum 15140
> Sent 50545633991 bytes 33385894 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 19)
> rate 9258Mbit 764335pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 19
> 117 flow, 115 inactive, 0 throttled
> 0 gc, 0 highprio, 0 retrans, 96861 throttled, 0 flows_plimit
> [ 572.551664] latency = 3035 ns
>
>
> What do you get with this debugging patch ?
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_fq.c b/net/sched/sch_fq.c
> index 32ad015..c1312a0 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_fq.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_fq.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ struct fq_sched_data {
> u64 stat_internal_packets;
> u64 stat_tcp_retrans;
> u64 stat_throttled;
> + s64 slatency;
> u64 stat_flows_plimit;
> u64 stat_pkts_too_long;
> u64 stat_allocation_errors;
> @@ -393,6 +394,7 @@ static int fq_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch)
> static void fq_check_throttled(struct fq_sched_data *q, u64 now)
> {
> struct rb_node *p;
> + bool first = true;
>
> if (q->time_next_delayed_flow > now)
> return;
> @@ -405,6 +407,13 @@ static void fq_check_throttled(struct fq_sched_data *q, u64 now)
> q->time_next_delayed_flow = f->time_next_packet;
> break;
> }
> + if (first) {
> + s64 delay = now - f->time_next_packet;
> +
> + first = false;
> + delay -= q->slatency >> 3;
> + q->slatency += delay;
> + }
> rb_erase(p, &q->delayed);
> q->throttled_flows--;
> fq_flow_add_tail(&q->old_flows, f);
> @@ -711,6 +720,7 @@ static int fq_dump(struct Qdisc *sch, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (opts == NULL)
> goto nla_put_failure;
>
> + pr_err("latency = %lld ns\n", q->slatency >> 3);
> if (nla_put_u32(skb, TCA_FQ_PLIMIT, sch->limit) ||
> nla_put_u32(skb, TCA_FQ_FLOW_PLIMIT, q->flow_plimit) ||
> nla_put_u32(skb, TCA_FQ_QUANTUM, q->quantum) ||
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-04 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-29 22:49 [PATCH v2 net-next] pkt_sched: fq: Fair Queue packet scheduler Eric Dumazet
2013-08-30 1:47 ` David Miller
2013-08-30 2:30 ` [PATCH iproute2] " Eric Dumazet
2013-09-03 15:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-09-04 5:26 ` [PATCH v2 net-next] " Jason Wang
2013-09-04 5:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-09-04 6:30 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-04 10:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-09-04 11:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-09-04 11:59 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2013-09-05 3:39 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-05 0:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-09-05 1:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-09-05 3:43 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-05 3:34 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-05 3:07 ` Jason Wang
2013-09-05 3:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-09-05 5:16 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5227209F.4060708@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).