* [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] bonding: restructure and add rcu for bond_for_each_slave_next()
@ 2013-09-05 7:49 Ding Tianhong
2013-09-05 13:30 ` Veaceslav Falico
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ding Tianhong @ 2013-09-05 7:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jay Vosburgh, Andy Gospodarek, David S. Miller,
Nikolay Aleksandrov, Veaceslav Falico, Netdev
Remove the wordy int and add bond_for_each_slave_next_rcu() for future use.
Suggested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 3 +--
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 ++----
drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index 91f179d..c75d383 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -383,7 +383,6 @@ static struct slave *rlb_next_rx_slave(struct bonding *bond)
{
struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
struct slave *rx_slave, *slave, *start_at;
- int i = 0;
if (bond_info->next_rx_slave)
start_at = bond_info->next_rx_slave;
@@ -392,7 +391,7 @@ static struct slave *rlb_next_rx_slave(struct bonding *bond)
rx_slave = NULL;
- bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, i, start_at) {
+ bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, start_at) {
if (SLAVE_IS_OK(slave)) {
if (!rx_slave) {
rx_slave = slave;
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 39e5b1c..4190389 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -782,7 +782,6 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
struct slave *new_active, *old_active;
struct slave *bestslave = NULL;
int mintime = bond->params.updelay;
- int i;
new_active = bond->curr_active_slave;
@@ -801,7 +800,7 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
/* remember where to stop iterating over the slaves */
old_active = new_active;
- bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, new_active, i, old_active) {
+ bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, new_active, old_active) {
if (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_UP) {
return new_active;
} else if (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_BACK &&
@@ -2756,7 +2755,6 @@ do_failover:
static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
{
struct slave *slave, *next_slave;
- int i;
read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
@@ -2788,7 +2786,7 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
/* search for next candidate */
next_slave = bond_next_slave(bond, bond->current_arp_slave);
- bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, i, next_slave) {
+ bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, next_slave) {
if (IS_UP(slave->dev)) {
slave->link = BOND_LINK_BACK;
bond_set_slave_active_flags(slave);
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
index f013b12..48fd41a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
@@ -123,18 +123,33 @@
(bond_is_first_slave(bond, pos) ? bond_last_slave_rcu(bond) : \
bond_to_slave_rcu((pos)->list.prev))
+/* Check whether the slave is the only one in bond */
+
/**
* bond_for_each_slave_from - iterate the slaves list from a starting point
* @bond: the bond holding this list.
* @pos: current slave.
- * @cnt: counter for max number of moves
* @start: starting point.
*
* Caller must hold bond->lock
*/
-#define bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, pos, cnt, start) \
- for (cnt = 0, pos = start; pos && cnt < (bond)->slave_cnt; \
- cnt++, pos = bond_next_slave(bond, pos))
+#define bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, pos, start) \
+ for (pos = start; pos && &pos->list != &bond->slave_list; \
+ (pos = bond_next_slave(bond, pos)) != start ? pos : \
+ (pos = list_entry(&bond->slave_list, typeof(*pos), list)))
+
+/**
+ * bond_for_each_slave_from_rcu - iterate the slaves list from a starting point
+ * @bond: the bond holding this list.
+ * @pos: current slave.
+ * @start: starting point.
+ *
+ * Caller must hold rcu_read_lock
+ */
+#define bond_for_each_slave_from_rcu(bond, pos, start) \
+ for (pos = start; pos && &pos->list != &bond->slave_list; \
+ (pos = bond_next_slave_rcu(bond, pos)) != start ? pos : \
+ (pos = list_entry_rcu(&bond->slave_list, typeof(*pos), list)))
/**
* bond_for_each_slave - iterate over all slaves
--
1.8.2.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] bonding: restructure and add rcu for bond_for_each_slave_next()
2013-09-05 7:49 [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] bonding: restructure and add rcu for bond_for_each_slave_next() Ding Tianhong
@ 2013-09-05 13:30 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-05 14:29 ` Ding Tianhong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Veaceslav Falico @ 2013-09-05 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ding Tianhong
Cc: Jay Vosburgh, Andy Gospodarek, David S. Miller,
Nikolay Aleksandrov, Netdev
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:49:01PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>Remove the wordy int and add bond_for_each_slave_next_rcu() for future use.
>
>Suggested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
>Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
>Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
>Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
>Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 3 +--
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 ++----
> drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>index 91f179d..c75d383 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>@@ -383,7 +383,6 @@ static struct slave *rlb_next_rx_slave(struct bonding *bond)
> {
> struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
> struct slave *rx_slave, *slave, *start_at;
>- int i = 0;
>
> if (bond_info->next_rx_slave)
> start_at = bond_info->next_rx_slave;
>@@ -392,7 +391,7 @@ static struct slave *rlb_next_rx_slave(struct bonding *bond)
>
> rx_slave = NULL;
>
>- bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, i, start_at) {
>+ bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, start_at) {
> if (SLAVE_IS_OK(slave)) {
> if (!rx_slave) {
> rx_slave = slave;
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index 39e5b1c..4190389 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>@@ -782,7 +782,6 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
> struct slave *new_active, *old_active;
> struct slave *bestslave = NULL;
> int mintime = bond->params.updelay;
>- int i;
>
> new_active = bond->curr_active_slave;
>
>@@ -801,7 +800,7 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
> /* remember where to stop iterating over the slaves */
> old_active = new_active;
>
>- bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, new_active, i, old_active) {
>+ bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, new_active, old_active) {
> if (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_UP) {
> return new_active;
> } else if (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_BACK &&
>@@ -2756,7 +2755,6 @@ do_failover:
> static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
> {
> struct slave *slave, *next_slave;
>- int i;
>
> read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
>
>@@ -2788,7 +2786,7 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
>
> /* search for next candidate */
> next_slave = bond_next_slave(bond, bond->current_arp_slave);
>- bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, i, next_slave) {
>+ bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, next_slave) {
> if (IS_UP(slave->dev)) {
> slave->link = BOND_LINK_BACK;
> bond_set_slave_active_flags(slave);
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>index f013b12..48fd41a 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>@@ -123,18 +123,33 @@
> (bond_is_first_slave(bond, pos) ? bond_last_slave_rcu(bond) : \
> bond_to_slave_rcu((pos)->list.prev))
>
>+/* Check whether the slave is the only one in bond */
>+
> /**
> * bond_for_each_slave_from - iterate the slaves list from a starting point
> * @bond: the bond holding this list.
> * @pos: current slave.
>- * @cnt: counter for max number of moves
> * @start: starting point.
> *
> * Caller must hold bond->lock
> */
>-#define bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, pos, cnt, start) \
>- for (cnt = 0, pos = start; pos && cnt < (bond)->slave_cnt; \
>- cnt++, pos = bond_next_slave(bond, pos))
>+#define bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, pos, start) \
>+ for (pos = start; pos && &pos->list != &bond->slave_list; \
>+ (pos = bond_next_slave(bond, pos)) != start ? pos : \
>+ (pos = list_entry(&bond->slave_list, typeof(*pos), list)))
Do you understand the differences of these two implementations?
pos && cnt < (bond)->slave_cnt
vs
pos && &pos->list != &bond->slave_list
I'm sorry, but you should listen to comments.
>+
>+/**
>+ * bond_for_each_slave_from_rcu - iterate the slaves list from a starting point
>+ * @bond: the bond holding this list.
>+ * @pos: current slave.
>+ * @start: starting point.
>+ *
>+ * Caller must hold rcu_read_lock
>+ */
>+#define bond_for_each_slave_from_rcu(bond, pos, start) \
>+ for (pos = start; pos && &pos->list != &bond->slave_list; \
>+ (pos = bond_next_slave_rcu(bond, pos)) != start ? pos : \
>+ (pos = list_entry_rcu(&bond->slave_list, typeof(*pos), list)))
>
> /**
> * bond_for_each_slave - iterate over all slaves
>--
>1.8.2.1
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] bonding: restructure and add rcu for bond_for_each_slave_next()
2013-09-05 13:30 ` Veaceslav Falico
@ 2013-09-05 14:29 ` Ding Tianhong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ding Tianhong @ 2013-09-05 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Veaceslav Falico
Cc: Ding Tianhong, Jay Vosburgh, Andy Gospodarek, David S. Miller,
Nikolay Aleksandrov, Netdev
于 2013/9/5 21:30, Veaceslav Falico 写道:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:49:01PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> Remove the wordy int and add bond_for_each_slave_next_rcu() for
>> future use.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
>> Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
>> Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 3 +--
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 ++----
>> drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
>> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> index 91f179d..c75d383 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> @@ -383,7 +383,6 @@ static struct slave *rlb_next_rx_slave(struct
>> bonding *bond)
>> {
>> struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
>> struct slave *rx_slave, *slave, *start_at;
>> - int i = 0;
>>
>> if (bond_info->next_rx_slave)
>> start_at = bond_info->next_rx_slave;
>> @@ -392,7 +391,7 @@ static struct slave *rlb_next_rx_slave(struct
>> bonding *bond)
>>
>> rx_slave = NULL;
>>
>> - bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, i, start_at) {
>> + bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, start_at) {
>> if (SLAVE_IS_OK(slave)) {
>> if (!rx_slave) {
>> rx_slave = slave;
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> index 39e5b1c..4190389 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> @@ -782,7 +782,6 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct
>> bonding *bond)
>> struct slave *new_active, *old_active;
>> struct slave *bestslave = NULL;
>> int mintime = bond->params.updelay;
>> - int i;
>>
>> new_active = bond->curr_active_slave;
>>
>> @@ -801,7 +800,7 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct
>> bonding *bond)
>> /* remember where to stop iterating over the slaves */
>> old_active = new_active;
>>
>> - bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, new_active, i, old_active) {
>> + bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, new_active, old_active) {
>> if (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_UP) {
>> return new_active;
>> } else if (new_active->link == BOND_LINK_BACK &&
>> @@ -2756,7 +2755,6 @@ do_failover:
>> static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
>> {
>> struct slave *slave, *next_slave;
>> - int i;
>>
>> read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
>>
>> @@ -2788,7 +2786,7 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding
>> *bond)
>>
>> /* search for next candidate */
>> next_slave = bond_next_slave(bond, bond->current_arp_slave);
>> - bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, i, next_slave) {
>> + bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, next_slave) {
>> if (IS_UP(slave->dev)) {
>> slave->link = BOND_LINK_BACK;
>> bond_set_slave_active_flags(slave);
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>> b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>> index f013b12..48fd41a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>> @@ -123,18 +123,33 @@
>> (bond_is_first_slave(bond, pos) ? bond_last_slave_rcu(bond) : \
>> bond_to_slave_rcu((pos)->list.prev))
>>
>> +/* Check whether the slave is the only one in bond */
>> +
>> /**
>> * bond_for_each_slave_from - iterate the slaves list from a starting
>> point
>> * @bond: the bond holding this list.
>> * @pos: current slave.
>> - * @cnt: counter for max number of moves
>> * @start: starting point.
>> *
>> * Caller must hold bond->lock
>> */
>> -#define bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, pos, cnt, start) \
>> - for (cnt = 0, pos = start; pos && cnt < (bond)->slave_cnt; \
>> - cnt++, pos = bond_next_slave(bond, pos))
>> +#define bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, pos, start) \
>> + for (pos = start; pos && &pos->list != &bond->slave_list; \
>> + (pos = bond_next_slave(bond, pos)) != start ? pos : \
>> + (pos = list_entry(&bond->slave_list, typeof(*pos), list)))
>
> Do you understand the differences of these two implementations?
>
> pos && cnt < (bond)->slave_cnt
>
> vs
>
> pos && &pos->list != &bond->slave_list
>
> I'm sorry, but you should listen to comments.
>
if the slave is only one, it will run once, and out the loop, else if
the slave is more than one, it will run until reach the start again,
here I use the &bond->slave_list to control the loop, as it will not
change any time, maybe it is hard to understand first.
ok, I think they are same, just in the purpose to remove the cnt, so
maybe it make you
unconfortable, sorry about that, if you strangly disagree, I will miss
this patch, but
thanks again for your different opinions. :)
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * bond_for_each_slave_from_rcu - iterate the slaves list from a
>> starting point
>> + * @bond: the bond holding this list.
>> + * @pos: current slave.
>> + * @start: starting point.
>> + *
>> + * Caller must hold rcu_read_lock
>> + */
>> +#define bond_for_each_slave_from_rcu(bond, pos, start) \
>> + for (pos = start; pos && &pos->list != &bond->slave_list; \
>> + (pos = bond_next_slave_rcu(bond, pos)) != start ? pos : \
>> + (pos = list_entry_rcu(&bond->slave_list, typeof(*pos), list)))
>>
>> /**
>> * bond_for_each_slave - iterate over all slaves
>> --
>> 1.8.2.1
>>
>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-05 14:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-05 7:49 [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] bonding: restructure and add rcu for bond_for_each_slave_next() Ding Tianhong
2013-09-05 13:30 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-05 14:29 ` Ding Tianhong
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).