From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Thomas Backlund <tmb@mageia.org>,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [GLIBC Patch v2] inet: avoid redefinition of some structs in kernel
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:52:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52295F71.50401@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201308260126.06626.vapier@gentoo.org>
On 08/26/2013 01:26 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 15 August 2013 05:28:11 Cong Wang wrote:
>> From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
>>
>> - Synchronize linux's `include/uapi/linux/in6.h'
>> with glibc's `inet/netinet/in.h'.
>> - Synchronize glibc's `inet/netinet/in.h with linux's
>> `include/uapi/linux/in6.h'.
>> - Allow including the headers in either other.
>> - First header included defines the structures and macros.
>>
>> Notes:
>> - You want netinet/in.h to include bits/in.h as early as possible,
>> but it needs in_addr so define in_addr early.
>> - You want bits/in.h included as early as possible so you can use
>> the linux specific code to define __USE_KERNEL_DEFS based on
>> the _UAPI_* macro definition and use those to cull in.h.
>> - glibc was missing IPPROTO_MH, added here.
>
> can we get something better documented here in a central location ? having
> the names laid out in a git commit message and in a few leaf headers does not
> lend itself to being easily discoverable.
Care to suggest something?
Cheers,
Carlos.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-06 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-15 9:28 [Patch net-next v2] net: sync some IP headers with glibc Cong Wang
2013-08-15 9:28 ` [GLIBC Patch v2] inet: avoid redefinition of some structs in kernel Cong Wang
2013-08-16 15:15 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-08-16 15:32 ` Andreas Jaeger
2013-08-16 15:44 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-08-16 15:47 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-08-19 1:20 ` Cong Wang
2013-08-19 18:11 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-08-26 5:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-09-06 4:52 ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2013-09-04 17:13 ` [Patch net-next v2] net: sync some IP headers with glibc David Miller
2013-09-06 5:19 ` Carlos O'Donell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52295F71.50401@redhat.com \
--to=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmb@mageia.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).