From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
To: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/4] bridge: Fix the way the PVID is referenced
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:24:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522F2B80.20703@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378809451.3988.11.camel@ubuntu-vm-makita>
On 09/10/2013 06:37 AM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> We are using the VLAN_TAG_PRESENT bit to detect whether the PVID is
> set or not at br_get_pvid(), while we don't care about the bit in
> adding/deleting the PVID, which makes it impossible to forward any
> incomming untagged frame with vlan_filtering enabled.
>
> Since vid 0 cannot be used for the PVID, we can use vid 0 to indicate
> that the PVID is not set, which is slightly more efficient than using
> the VLAN_TAG_PRESENT.
Yes, that is simpler.
>
> Fix the problem by getting rid of using the VLAN_TAG_PRESENT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@redhat.com>
-vlad
> ---
> net/bridge/br_private.h | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> index 598cb0b..435ca4d 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> @@ -646,9 +646,7 @@ static inline u16 br_get_pvid(const struct net_port_vlans *v)
> * vid wasn't set
> */
> smp_rmb();
> - return (v->pvid & VLAN_TAG_PRESENT) ?
> - (v->pvid & ~VLAN_TAG_PRESENT) :
> - VLAN_N_VID;
> + return v->pvid ?: VLAN_N_VID;
> }
>
> #else
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-10 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-10 10:27 [PATCH net 0/4] bridge: Fix problems around the PVID Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-10 10:32 ` [PATCH net 1/4] bridge: Don't use VID 0 and 4095 in vlan filtering Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-10 14:22 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-12 19:55 ` David Miller
2013-09-12 20:57 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-10 10:34 ` [PATCH net 2/4] bridge: Handle priority-tagged frames properly Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-10 14:03 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-11 7:00 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-11 16:32 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-12 8:08 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-10 10:37 ` [PATCH net 3/4] bridge: Fix the way the PVID is referenced Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-10 14:08 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-10 14:24 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2013-09-10 10:39 ` [PATCH net 4/4] bridge: Fix updating FDB entries when the PVID is applied Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-10 14:24 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-12 20:00 ` [PATCH net 0/4] bridge: Fix problems around the PVID David Miller
2013-09-13 12:06 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-13 15:21 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-14 15:42 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-16 17:49 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-17 8:12 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-23 14:41 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-24 11:45 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-24 13:35 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-24 17:30 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-24 17:55 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-26 10:38 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-26 14:22 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-27 17:11 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-27 18:10 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-30 11:46 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-30 16:01 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-10-01 11:56 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-10-09 15:01 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-10-11 7:34 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-10-11 14:14 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-10-13 16:11 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-10-15 13:55 ` Vlad Yasevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=522F2B80.20703@redhat.com \
--to=vyasevic@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).