From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: Toeplitz library functions Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:37:54 -0700 Message-ID: <5241CDF2.1020601@hp.com> References: <1379980991.3165.37.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130924023038.GA22393@order.stressinduktion.org> <20130924033505.GB22393@order.stressinduktion.org> <1380001118.3165.41.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130924160145.GB26769@order.stressinduktion.org> <1380039299.3165.91.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1380041185.3165.97.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1380044075.3165.108.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tom Herbert , Hannes Frederic Sowa , David Miller , Linux Netdev List , "Brandeburg, Jesse" To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from g4t0016.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.19]:48696 "EHLO g4t0016.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750721Ab3IXRh7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:37:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1380044075.3165.108.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/24/2013 10:34 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > If you have multiqueue NIC, you do not use RPS/RFS, so skb->rxhash might > be 0 If one has a CPU count >> the NIC queue count, mightn't one still want to use RPS/RFS? rick jones