From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Chris Verges <cverges@sentient-energy.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Established sockets remain open after iface down or address lost
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 08:44:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524AEDD1.9010709@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131001132707.GA7442@cverges-dev-lnx.sentient-energy.com>
On 10/01/2013 06:27 AM, Chris Verges wrote:
> The client establishes a connection to the server. It requests some
> data and gets a response. The socket remains open. The server then
> decides, through some asynchronous process, that the radio needs to be
> duty cycled. So the radio is turned off.
>
> The client attempts to make another request to the device, but
> determines that the connection is dead through the normal retry
> mechanisms. It's write() operation returns something like EPIPE. So on
> the client's side, the connection is dead.
>
> But on the server side, the socket is still open and waiting for some
> more data. The interface and IP address and even the remote client are
> long gone, but the socket still persists and uses system resources.
The protocol between client and server needs to have an
application-layer "keepalive" mechanism added, and then the server will
be able to detect a dangling connection without need of any further
kernel modifications.
If that is not possible, the server can/should set SO_KEEPALIVE and
perhaps tweak the TCP keepalive settings. Not as good (IMO) as an
application-layer keepalive because it only shows that the connection is
good as far as TCP, but I suppose it could do in a pinch.
rick jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-01 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-26 6:04 Established sockets remain open after iface down or address lost Chris Verges
2013-09-26 13:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-01 13:27 ` Chris Verges
2013-10-01 15:44 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2013-10-01 16:08 ` Chris Verges
2013-10-01 17:06 ` Rick Jones
2013-10-01 16:33 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2013-10-01 17:07 ` Chris Verges
2013-10-01 19:00 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524AEDD1.9010709@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=cverges@sentient-energy.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).