From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: gro: allow to build full sized skb
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:14:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52542F77.2050308@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381248143.12191.53.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
On 10/08/2013 09:02 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>
> skb_gro_receive() is currently limited to 16 or 17 MSS per GRO skb,
> typically 24616 bytes, because it fills up to MAX_SKB_FRAGS frags.
>
> It's relatively easy to extend the skb using frag_list to allow
> more frags to be appended into the last sk_buff.
>
> This still builds very efficient skbs, and allows reaching 45 MSS per
> skb.
>
> (45 MSS GRO packet uses one skb plus a frag_list containing 2 additional
> sk_buff)
>
> High speed TCP flows benefit from this extension by lowering TCP stack
> cpu usage (less packets stored in receive queue, less ACK packets
> processed)
>
> Forwarding setups could be hurt, as such skbs will need to be
> linearized, although its not a new problem, as GRO could already
> provide skbs with a frag_list.
>
> We could make the 65536 bytes threshold a tunable to mitigate this.
>
> (First time we need to linearize skb in skb_needs_linearize(), we could
> lower the tunable to ~16*1460 so that following skb_gro_receive() calls
> build smaller skbs)
On multi-homed boxes you could easily have paths that would never need linearize
and other paths that always need it, for whatever reason.
Maybe a per-netdev check for needs linearize instead of something global
would be better...and maybe let users over-ride the default behaviour
regardless?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-08 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-08 16:02 [PATCH net-next] net: gro: allow to build full sized skb Eric Dumazet
2013-10-08 16:14 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2013-10-08 16:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-10 4:17 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52542F77.2050308@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).