From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/77] Re-design MSI/MSI-X interrupts enablement pattern Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 21:55:26 -0400 Message-ID: <5254B78E.3020009@start.ca> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Ralf Baechle , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Martin Schwidefsky , Ingo Molnar , Tejun Heo , Dan Williams , Andy King , Jon Mason , Matt Porter , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, iss_storagedev@hp.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-driver@qlogic.com, Solarflare linux maintainers , VMware@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com, "Inc." , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 13-10-02 06:29 AM, Alexander Gordeev wrote: .. > This update converts pci_enable_msix() and pci_enable_msi_block() > interfaces to canonical kernel functions and makes them return a > error code in case of failure or 0 in case of success. Rather than silently break dozens of drivers in mysterious ways, please invent new function names for the replacements to the existing pci_enable_msix() and pci_enable_msi_block() functions. That way, both in-tree and out-of-tree drivers will notice the API change, rather than having it go unseen and just failing for unknown reasons. Thanks.