From: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Crt Mori <cmo@melexis.com>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
Luo Jie <quic_luoj@quicinc.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
david.laight.linux@gmail.com
Cc: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] bitmap: Use FIELD_PREP() in expansion of FIELD_PREP_WM16()
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 14:22:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5257288.LvFx2qVVIh@workhorse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251212193721.740055-4-david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
On Friday, 12 December 2025 20:37:08 Central European Standard Time david.laight.linux@gmail.com wrote:
> From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
>
> Instead of directly expanding __BF_FIELD_CHECK() (which really ought
> not be used outside bitfield) and open-coding the generation of the
> masked value, just call FIELD_PREP() and add an extra check for
> the mask being at most 16 bits.
> The extra check is added after calling FIELD_PREP() to get a sane
> error message if 'mask' isn't constant.
>
> Remove the leading _ from the formal parameter names.
> Prefix the local variables with _wm16_ to hopefully make them
> unique.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Changes for v2:
> - Update kerneldoc to match changed formal parameter names.
> - Change local variables to not collide with those in FIELD_PREP().
>
> Most of the examples are constants and get optimised away.
>
> include/linux/hw_bitfield.h | 21 ++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hw_bitfield.h b/include/linux/hw_bitfield.h
> index df202e167ce4..0bd1040a5f93 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hw_bitfield.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hw_bitfield.h
> @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@
>
> /**
> * FIELD_PREP_WM16() - prepare a bitfield element with a mask in the upper half
> - * @_mask: shifted mask defining the field's length and position
> - * @_val: value to put in the field
> + * @mask: shifted mask defining the field's length and position
> + * @val: value to put in the field
> *
> * FIELD_PREP_WM16() masks and shifts up the value, as well as bitwise ORs the
> * result with the mask shifted up by 16.
> @@ -23,15 +23,14 @@
> * register, a bit in the lower half is only updated if the corresponding bit
> * in the upper half is high.
> */
> -#define FIELD_PREP_WM16(_mask, _val) \
> - ({ \
> - typeof(_val) __val = _val; \
> - typeof(_mask) __mask = _mask; \
> - __BF_FIELD_CHECK(__mask, ((u16)0U), __val, \
> - "HWORD_UPDATE: "); \
> - (((typeof(__mask))(__val) << __bf_shf(__mask)) & (__mask)) | \
> - ((__mask) << 16); \
> - })
> +#define FIELD_PREP_WM16(mask, val) \
> +({ \
> + __auto_type _wm16_mask = mask; \
> + u32 _wm16_val = FIELD_PREP(_wm16_mask, val); \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(_wm16_mask > 0xffffu, \
> + "FIELD_PREP_WM16: mask too large"); \
> + _wm16_val | (_wm16_mask << 16); \
> +})
>
> /**
> * FIELD_PREP_WM16_CONST() - prepare a constant bitfield element with a mask in
>
Tested-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
Compiled it with my usual config and booted it on a board that uses
drivers that make use of these macros, and checked that things are
working.
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-17 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-12 19:37 [PATCH v2 0/16] bitfield: tidy up bitfield.h david.laight.linux
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] nfp: Call FIELD_PREP() in NFP_ETH_SET_BIT_CONFIG() wrapper david.laight.linux
2025-12-12 23:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] thunderbolt: Don't pass a bitfield to FIELD_GET david.laight.linux
2025-12-13 2:28 ` Yury Norov
2025-12-13 10:01 ` David Laight
2025-12-13 22:14 ` David Laight
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] bitmap: Use FIELD_PREP() in expansion of FIELD_PREP_WM16() david.laight.linux
2025-12-17 13:22 ` Nicolas Frattaroli [this message]
2025-12-18 0:16 ` Yury Norov
2025-12-18 8:44 ` David Laight
2025-12-19 13:11 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] bitfield: Copy #define parameters to locals david.laight.linux
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] bitfield: Merge __field_prep/get() into field_prep/get() david.laight.linux
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] bitfield: Remove some pointless casts david.laight.linux
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] bitfield: FIELD_MODIFY: Only do a single read/write on the target david.laight.linux
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] bitfield: Simplify __BF_FIELD_CHECK_REG() david.laight.linux
2025-12-17 10:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-17 22:31 ` David Laight
2025-12-18 0:10 ` Yury Norov
2025-12-28 18:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-28 22:50 ` David Laight
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] bitfield: Rename __FIELD_PREP/GET() to __BF_FIELD_PREP/GET() david.laight.linux
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] bitfield: Split the 'val' check out of __BF_FIELD_CHECK_MASK() david.laight.linux
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] bitfield: Common up validation of the mask parameter david.laight.linux
2025-12-14 6:19 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-14 13:17 ` David Laight
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] bitfield: Remove leading _ from #define formal parameter names david.laight.linux
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] bitfield: Reduce indentation david.laight.linux
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] bitfield: Add comment block for the host/fixed endian functions david.laight.linux
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] bitfield: Update comments for le/be functions david.laight.linux
2025-12-12 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] build_bug.h; Remove __BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2() david.laight.linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5257288.LvFx2qVVIh@workhorse \
--to=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=cmo@melexis.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=quic_luoj@quicinc.com \
--cc=richard.genoud@bootlin.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).