From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/77] Re-design MSI/MSI-X interrupts enablement pattern Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:29:39 -0400 Message-ID: <52585FB3.7080508@start.ca> References: <5254D397.9030307@zytor.com> <1381292648.645.259.camel@pasglop> <20131010101704.GC11874@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> <5256D5AB.4050105@zytor.com> <20131010180704.GA15719@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> <5257357E.8080506@start.ca> <20131011084108.GA25702@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Ralf Baechle , Michael Ellerman , Martin Schwidefsky , Ingo Molnar , Tejun Heo , Dan Williams , Andy King , Jon Mason , Matt Porter , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, iss_storagedev@hp.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, e1000-dev To: Alexander Gordeev Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131011084108.GA25702@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 13-10-11 04:41 AM, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 07:17:18PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote: >> Just to help us all understand "the loop" issue.. >> >> Here's an example of driver code which uses the existing MSI-X interfaces, >> for a device which can work with either 16, 8, 4, 2, or 1 MSI-X interrupt. >> This is from a new driver I'm working on right now: .. > Now, this is a loop-free alternative: > > static int xx_alloc_msix_irqs(struct xx_dev *dev, int nvec) > { > nvec = roundup_pow_of_two(nvec); /* assume 0 > nvec <= 16 */ > > xx_disable_all_irqs(dev); > > pci_lock_msi(dev->pdev); > > rc = pci_get_msix_limit(dev->pdev, nvec); > if (rc < 0) > goto err; > > nvec = min(nvec, rc); /* if limit is more than requested */ > nvec = rounddown_pow_of_two(nvec); /* (a) */ > > xx_prep_for_msix_vectors(dev, nvec); > > rc = pci_enable_msix(dev->pdev, dev->irqs, nvec); /* (b) */ > if (rc < 0) > goto err; > > pci_unlock_msi(dev->pdev); > > dev->num_vectors = nvec; /* (b) */ > return 0; > > err: > pci_unlock_msi(dev->pdev); > > kerr(dev->name, "pci_enable_msix() failed, err=%d", rc); > dev->num_vectors = 0; > return rc; > } That would still need a loop, to handle the natural race between the calls to pci_get_msix_limit() and pci_enable_msix() -- the driver and device can and should fall back to a smaller number of vectors when pci_enable_msix() fails.