From: Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>, <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
<steffen.klassert@secunet.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 RESEND] {xfrm, sctp} Stick to software crc32 even if hardware is capable of that
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:17:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525D0827.2070301@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fed034cb-be28-488b-883f-627e8e7499b9@email.android.com>
On 2013年10月14日 22:16, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>
>
> Fan Du<fan.du@windriver.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 2013年10月14日 16:07, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On 10/14/2013 09:27 AM, Fan Du wrote:
>>>> igb/ixgbe have hardware sctp checksum support, when this feature is
>> enabled
>>>> and also IPsec is armed to protect sctp traffic, ugly things
>> happened as
>>>> xfrm_output checks CHECKSUM_PARTIAL to do check sum operation(sum
>> every thing
>>>> up and pack the 16bits result in the checksum field). The result is
>> fail
>>>> establishment of sctp communication.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fan Du<fan.du@windriver.com>
>>>> Cc: Vlad Yasevich<vyasevich@gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: Neil Horman<nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
>>>> Cc: Steffen Klassert<steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich<vyasevich@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> net/sctp/output.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/output.c b/net/sctp/output.c
>>>> index 0ac3a65..6de6402 100644
>>>> --- a/net/sctp/output.c
>>>> +++ b/net/sctp/output.c
>>>> @@ -372,6 +372,16 @@ static void sctp_packet_set_owner_w(struct
>> sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
>>>> atomic_inc(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static int is_xfrm_armed(struct dst_entry *dst)
>>>> +{
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>>>> + /* If dst->xfrm is valid, this skb needs to be transformed */
>>>> + return dst->xfrm != NULL;
>>>> +#else
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> Instead of putting this into SCTP code, isn't the above rather a
>> candidate for
>>> include/net/xfrm.h, e.g. as ... bool xfrm_is_armed(...) ?
>>
>> Should be in such style in terms of its name, but this is truly SCTP
>> specific in this scenario.
>> No one elsewhere barely need this as far as I can tell...
>
> It almost begs for dst_xfrm() function that returns NULL or dst->xfrm.
> Thar can live in dst code.
Ok, I will show my love in such style in v3.
> -vlad
>
--
浮沉随浪只记今朝笑
--fan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-15 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-14 7:27 [PATCHv2 RESEND] {xfrm, sctp} Stick to software crc32 even if hardware is capable of that Fan Du
2013-10-14 8:07 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-10-14 8:33 ` Fan Du
2013-10-14 14:16 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-10-15 9:17 ` Fan Du [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525D0827.2070301@windriver.com \
--to=fan.du@windriver.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).