From: jianhai luan <jianhai.luan@oracle.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
ANNIE LI <annie.li@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: DomU's network interface will hung when Dom0 running 32bit
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:15:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525DDAAE.9050400@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <525D6C16.6010705@oracle.com>
On 2013-10-16 0:23, jianhai luan wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-16 0:03, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:19:42PM +0800, jianhai luan wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>>>> * time_after_eq(now, next_credit) -> false
>>>>>>> * time_before(now, expires) -> false
>>>>>> If now is placed in above environment, the result will be correct
>>>>>> (Sending package will be not allowed until next_credit).
>>>>> No, it is not necessarily correct. Keep in mind that "now" wraps
>>>>> around,
>>>>> which is the issue you try to fix. You still have a window to
>>>>> stall your
>>>>> frontend.
>>>> Remember that time_after_eq is supposed to work even with wraparound
>>>> occurring, so long as the two times are less than MAX_LONG/2 apart.
>>> Sorry for my misunderstand explanation. I mean that
>>> * time_after_eq()/time_before_eq() fix the jiffies wraparound, so
>>> please think about jiffies in line increasing.
>>> * time_after_eq()/time_before_eq() have the range (0, MAX_LONG/2),
>>> the judge will be wrong if out of the range.
>>>
>>> So please think about three kind environment
>>> - expires now next_credit
>>> --------time increases this direction ---------->
>>>
>>> - expires [next_credit now next_credit+MAX_LONG/2
>>> --------time increase this direction ----------->
>>>
>>> - expires next_credit next_credit+MAX_LONG/2 now
>>> --------time increadse this direction ---------->
>>>
>>> The first environment should be netfront consume all credit_byte
>>> before next_credit, So we should pending one timer to calculator the
>>> new credit_byte, and don't transmit until next_credit.
>>>
>>> the second environment should be calculator the credit_byte because
>>> netfront don't consume all credit_byte before next_credit, and
>>> time_after_eq() do correct judge.
>>>
>>> the third environment should be calculator in time because netfront
>>> don't consume all credit_byte until next_credit.But time_after_eq do
>>> error judge (time_after_eq(now, next_credit) is false), so the
>>> remaining_byte isn't be increased.
>>>
>>> and I work on the third environment. You know now >
>>> next_credit+MAX_LONG/2, time_before(now, expire) should be
>>> true(time_before(now, expire) is false in first environment)
>> Thanks for staighten this out for me. I'm just too dumb for this, please
>> be patient with me. :-)
>>
>> Could you prove that time_before(now, expire) is always true in third
>> case? That's where my main cencern lies. Is it because msecs_to_jiffies
>> always returns MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET (which is ((LONG_MAX >> 1)-1) ) at most?
>
> I have wrong judge in third environment. If now large than expires +
> MAX_UNLONG, time_before(now, expires) will be false.
> expires next_credit next_credit+MAX_UNLONG/2 expires +
> MAX_UNLONG now next_credit+MAX_UNLONG
> --------------------------------------------------------- time
> increadse this direction ---------------------------------->
>
> In the above environment, time_before(now, expires) will return
> false. But the jiffies elapsed more time and next_credit will be
> reachable in soon(time_after_eq(now, next_credit) will be true).
After above talk, the window should be exist (expire+MAX_ULONG
next_credit+MAX_ULONG, expire + 2MAX_ULONF next_credit+MAX_ULONG
....,expire+<n>ULONG next_credit+<n>MAX_ULONG). Other time window should
be not exist (maybe i don't think about).
If so, please think about the below:
* If no speed control, vif->credit_usec should be zero. expire =
next_credit and the window is zero
* If we have done speed control, the scenario should be very likely
than first environment except the value is larger (the delta is
<n>MAX_UNLONG)
- If do speed control. the window should have been think about
speed worse time
100M/s 40s
1000M/s 4s
- the time should be acceptable.
>>
>> Wei.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-12 8:53 DomU's network interface will hung when Dom0 running 32bit jianhai luan
2013-10-14 11:19 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 2:44 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 8:43 ` Ian Campbell
2013-10-15 9:34 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 10:06 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 11:26 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 12:58 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 14:29 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 14:49 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 14:50 ` Ian Campbell
2013-10-15 15:19 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 16:03 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 16:23 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 0:15 ` jianhai luan [this message]
2013-10-16 7:35 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 9:39 ` [Xen-devel] " annie li
2013-10-16 13:08 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 13:47 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-16 15:04 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 15:17 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-16 16:11 ` David Vrabel
2013-10-16 16:44 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 15:26 ` annie li
2013-10-16 7:10 ` annie li
2013-10-16 8:46 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525DDAAE.9050400@oracle.com \
--to=jianhai.luan@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=annie.li@oracle.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).