netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentijn Sessink <valentyn@blub.net>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: IPv6 path discovery oddities - flushing the routing cache resolves
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:31:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <525E6B03.1040409@blub.net> (raw)

Hello list,

I'm experiencing difficulties with IPv6 path discovery. The setup is 
quite simple, a machine with native IPv6, no special routing - let's 
call it the "server" for now. Unfortunately, I seem to loose 
connectivity multiple times a day - and after digging in, I found this 
to be "too big" messages that weren't honored at the server. The network 
consists of something like:

server --- hosting --- others ---- SIXXS tunnel with 1280 MTU --- me.

A "ip -6 route list cache" would show a cached route to my "client", but 
one without MTU. Then after "ip -6 route flush cache", and after trying 
to send a large packet (for example issuing "ps uaxww" on an ssh 
prompt), "ip -6 route list cache" will show a correct MTU.

But after a while, things start to go wrong again, and another "ip -6 
route flush cache" is needed.

The server is running 3.8.0-something (ubuntu 12.04 with a newer kernel).

tcpdump shows that on reception of icmpv6 "too big", nothing happens 
(i.e. the "too big" packet will be sent time and again), and after the 
"ip -6 route flush cache", suddenly the "too big" message is honored.

I saw a couple of path discovery issues on this list, more specifically 
one with the subject "IPv6 path MTU discovery broken" earlier this month 
- but I'm not sure it's the same issue (because the original submitter 
specifically mentions kernels 3.10 and 3.11 and has a much more 
complicated routing table).

The "server" just has:

auto br0
iface br0 inet6 static
   address 2a01:xxxx:xxx:xxxx::2
   netmask 64
   gateway fe80::1
   bridge_ports eth0
   bridge_maxwait 0

Nothing special, no special routes, no routing daemons.

If I can do anything to shine more light on this issue, please tell me so.

Best regards,

Valentijn

             reply	other threads:[~2013-10-16 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-16 10:31 Valentijn Sessink [this message]
2013-10-16 15:48 ` IPv6 path discovery oddities - flushing the routing cache resolves Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-10-17 10:53   ` Valentijn Sessink
2013-10-18  3:04     ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-10-18  6:44       ` Valentijn Sessink
2013-10-19  8:42         ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-10-19  8:53           ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-10-19 10:12           ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2013-10-19 14:24             ` Valentijn Sessink
2013-10-19 20:24               ` Hannes Frederic Sowa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=525E6B03.1040409@blub.net \
    --to=valentyn@blub.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).