From: jianhai luan <jianhai.luan@oracle.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: annie li <annie.li@oracle.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] DomU's network interface will hung when Dom0 running 32bit
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 23:04:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525EAB02.9050207@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131016134740.GG16371@zion.uk.xensource.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2170 bytes --]
On 2013-10-16 21:47, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 09:08:03PM +0800, jianhai luan wrote:
> [...]
>>>>> expires now next_credit
>>>>> ----time increases this direction--->
>>>>>
>>>>> * time_after_eq(now, next_credit) -> false
>>>>> * time_before(now, expires) -> false
>>>>>
>>>>> Then it's stuck again. You're merely narrowing the window, not fixing
>>>>> the real problem.
>>>> The above environment isn't stack again. The netback will
>>>> pending one timer to process the environment.
>>>>
>>>> The attachment program will prove if !(time_after_eq(now,
>>>> next_credit) || time_before(now, vif->credit_timeout.expires)),
>>>> now will only be placed in above environment [ expires
>>>> next_credit), and the above environment will be processed by
>>>> timer in soon.
>>> Or check following to see what the if condition really do,
>>>
>>> ----------expires-------now-------credit---------- is the only
>>> case where we need to add a timer.
>>>
>>> Other cases like following would match the if condition above,
>>> then no timer is added.
>>> ----------expires----------credit------now------
>>> -----now-----expires----------credit----------
>>>
>>> Or we can consider the extreme condition, when the rate control
>>> does not exist, "credit_usec" is zero, and "next_credit" is equal
>>> to "expires". The above if condition would cover all conditions,
>>> and no rate control really happens. If credit_usec is not zero,
>>> the "if condition" would cover the range outside of that from
>>> expires to next_credit.
>>>
>>> Even if "now" is wrapped again into the range from "expires" to
>>> "next_credit", the "next_credit" that is set in __mod_timer is
>>> reasonable value(this can be gotten from credit_usec), and the
>>> timer would be hit soon.
>> Thanks Annie's express, my option is consistent with Annie.
>>
> OK, thanks for the explanation. I think I get the idea.
>
> In any case, could you use !time_in_range / !time_in_range_open instead
> of open coded one-liner? Though I presume one-liner open coding would
> not hurt.
I agree above the suggest. The attachment patch may be better than
previous patch.
Jason
>
> Wei.
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-xen-netback-pending-timer-only-in-the-range-expire-n.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1627 bytes --]
>From ef02403a10173896c5c102f768741d0700b8a3a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Luan <jianhai.luan@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:07:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] xen-netback: pending timer only in the range [expire,
next_credit)
The function time_after_eq() do correct judge in range of MAX_UNLONG/2.
If net-front send lesser package, the delta between now and next_credit
will out of the range and time_after_eq() will do wrong judge in result
to net-front hung. For example:
expire next_credit .... next_credit+MAX_UNLONG/2 now
-----------------time increases this direction----------------->
We should be add the environment which now beyond next_credit+MAX_UNLONG/2.
Because the fact now mustn't before expire, time_before(now, expire) == true
will show the environment.
time_after_eq(now, next_credit) || time_before (now, expire)
==
!time_in_range_open(now, expire, next_credit)
Signed-off-by: Jason Luan <jianhai.luan@oracle.com>
---
drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
index f3e591c..62492f0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
@@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ static bool tx_credit_exceeded(struct xenvif *vif, unsigned size)
return true;
/* Passed the point where we can replenish credit? */
- if (time_after_eq(now, next_credit)) {
+ if (!time_in_range(now, vif->credit_timeout.expires, next_credit)) {
vif->credit_timeout.expires = now;
tx_add_credit(vif);
}
--
1.7.6.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-12 8:53 DomU's network interface will hung when Dom0 running 32bit jianhai luan
2013-10-14 11:19 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 2:44 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 8:43 ` Ian Campbell
2013-10-15 9:34 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 10:06 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 11:26 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 12:58 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 14:29 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 14:49 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 14:50 ` Ian Campbell
2013-10-15 15:19 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 16:03 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 16:23 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 0:15 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 7:35 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 9:39 ` [Xen-devel] " annie li
2013-10-16 13:08 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 13:47 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-16 15:04 ` jianhai luan [this message]
2013-10-16 15:17 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-16 16:11 ` David Vrabel
2013-10-16 16:44 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 15:26 ` annie li
2013-10-16 7:10 ` annie li
2013-10-16 8:46 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525EAB02.9050207@oracle.com \
--to=jianhai.luan@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=annie.li@oracle.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).