From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
To: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 2/4] bridge: Apply the PVID to priority-tagged frames
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:52:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525EB639.20507@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381910836-718-3-git-send-email-makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On 10/16/2013 04:07 AM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> IEEE 802.1Q says that when we receive priority-tagged (VID 0) frames
> use the PVID for the port as its VID.
> (See IEEE 802.1Q-2011 6.9.1 and Table 9-2)
>
> Apply the PVID to not only untagged frames but also priority-tagged frames.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_vlan.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> index 21b6d21..5a9c44a 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> @@ -189,6 +189,8 @@ out:
> bool br_allowed_ingress(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_port_vlans *v,
> struct sk_buff *skb, u16 *vid)
> {
> + int err;
> +
> /* If VLAN filtering is disabled on the bridge, all packets are
> * permitted.
> */
> @@ -201,20 +203,31 @@ bool br_allowed_ingress(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_port_vlans *v,
> if (!v)
> return false;
>
> - if (br_vlan_get_tag(skb, vid)) {
> + err = br_vlan_get_tag(skb, vid);
> + if (!*vid) {
> u16 pvid = br_get_pvid(v);
>
> - /* Frame did not have a tag. See if pvid is set
> - * on this port. That tells us which vlan untagged
> - * traffic belongs to.
> + /* Frame had a tag with VID 0 or did not have a tag.
> + * See if pvid is set on this port. That tells us which
> + * vlan untagged or priority-tagged traffic belongs to.
> */
> if (pvid == VLAN_N_VID)
> return false;
>
> - /* PVID is set on this port. Any untagged ingress
> - * frame is considered to belong to this vlan.
> + /* PVID is set on this port. Any untagged or priority-tagged
> + * ingress frame is considered to belong to this vlan.
> */
> - __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, htons(ETH_P_8021Q), pvid);
> + if (likely(err))
> + /* Untagged Frame. */
> + __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, htons(ETH_P_8021Q), pvid);
> + else
> + /* Priority-tagged Frame.
> + * At this point, We know that skb->vlan_tci had
> + * VLAN_TAG_PRESENT bit and its VID field was 0x000.
> + * We update only VID field and preserve PCP field.
> + */
> + skb->vlan_tci |= pvid;
> +
> return true;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-16 8:07 [PATCH v2 net 0/4] bridge: Fix problems around the PVID Toshiaki Makita
2013-10-16 8:07 ` [PATCH v2 net 1/4] bridge: Don't use VID 0 and 4095 in vlan filtering Toshiaki Makita
2013-10-16 15:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-10-16 8:07 ` [PATCH v2 net 2/4] bridge: Apply the PVID to priority-tagged frames Toshiaki Makita
2013-10-16 15:52 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2013-10-16 15:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-10-16 16:16 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-10-17 12:14 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-10-17 17:39 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-10-18 14:01 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-10-16 8:07 ` [PATCH v2 net 3/4] bridge: Fix the way the PVID is referenced Toshiaki Makita
2013-10-16 8:07 ` [PATCH v2 net 4/4] bridge: Fix updating FDB entries when the PVID is applied Toshiaki Makita
2013-10-16 15:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-10-16 16:11 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-10-17 12:52 ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-10-18 20:03 ` [PATCH v2 net 0/4] bridge: Fix problems around the PVID David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525EB639.20507@redhat.com \
--to=vyasevic@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).