From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>
To: Jimmy Perchet <jimmy.perchet@parrot.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] net:stmmac: fix jumbo frames handling and optimisation
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:37:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525EF8FF.2010206@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381937052-8999-1-git-send-email-jimmy.perchet@parrot.com>
Hello Jimmy
On 10/16/2013 5:24 PM, Jimmy Perchet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I began using Synopsys IP few weeks ago and figured out that jumbo frames
> are not well supported by stmmac driver.
I tested jumbo on chips w/o enhanced some time ago, so welcome further
tests as you did (maybe on new chips).
>
> This patch series addresses several issues which prevent them from working
> properly :
> *(1/5) Threshold dma mode is needed on rx path if jumbo frames are expected.
hmm, this depends on the HW. In the past I used HW with a Fifo that is
16KiB for rx buffers and 8KiB for tx.
So this could be managed according to these sizes I guess...
>
> *(2/5) RX buffers are not allocated with the needed size because
> priv->dma_buf_sz is updated too late (i.e. after stmmac_init_rx_buffers call)
I'll look at the patch in detail
>
> *(3/5) On low speed link (10MBit/s), some TX descriptors can remain dirty
> if the tx coalescence timer expires before they were treated. Re-arm timer
> in this case.
hmm not clear to me, let me look at the patch. I hope the link should
not impact... never seen on my side.
>
> *(4/5) There is several confusions regarding descriptor's max buffer size,
> typically the "-1" is often forgotten.
also for this I need to look at the patch
> *(4/5) Jumbo frames' last descriptor is never "closed", resulting in truncated
> frames transfer.
it sounds to be a bug... let me check
> *(4/5) Frags could not be jumbo.
> Regarding these last points, I didn't find simpler way than writing
> new "prepare frame" functions for both ring and chain mode and update
> xmit function accordingly.
it is strange and not clear too. At any rate, both modes must be
supported
>
> The last patch is not related to jumbo frames but concern a possible
> optimisation :
> *(5/5) Tx descriptor's cleanup and preparation are serialized, which is not
> necessary and decrease performance. In addition TX descriptor's cleanup is
> performed on NET_-RX- softirq, this is confusing.
> By taking care of "cur_tx" and "dirty_tx" it is possible to avoid serialization
> and defer cleanup in workqueue.
> On my smp embedded system, with 1Gbit/s link which is cpu bound, it increases
> througput by about 90MBit/s (400MBit/s to 490MBit/s).
This sounds another good point, let me enter in the patch
BR
Peppe
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Jimmy Perchet
>
> Jimmy Perchet (5):
> net:stmmac: set threshold/store and forward mode according to mtu
> size.
> net:stmmac: fix rx buffer allocation.
> net:stmmac: ensure we reclaim all dirty descriptors.
> net:stmmac: fix jumbo frame handling.
> net:stmmac: asynchronous tx_clean
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/chain_mode.c | 99 +++++-----
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h | 6 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/descs_com.h | 8 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/enh_desc.c | 6 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/norm_desc.c | 6 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/ring_mode.c | 90 ++++-----
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 6 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 219 +++++++++++++---------
> 8 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 207 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-16 15:24 [PATCH RFC 0/5] net:stmmac: fix jumbo frames handling and optimisation Jimmy Perchet
2013-10-16 15:24 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] net:stmmac: set threshold/store and forward mode according to mtu size Jimmy Perchet
2013-10-21 8:47 ` Giuseppe CAVALLARO
2013-10-21 9:58 ` Rayagond K
2013-10-21 13:49 ` Giuseppe CAVALLARO
2013-10-16 15:24 ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] net:stmmac: fix rx buffer allocation Jimmy Perchet
2013-10-21 8:54 ` Giuseppe CAVALLARO
2013-10-16 15:24 ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] net:stmmac: ensure we reclaim all dirty descriptors Jimmy Perchet
2013-10-16 17:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-10-18 8:32 ` Jimmy PERCHET
2013-10-21 9:07 ` Giuseppe CAVALLARO
2013-10-21 13:10 ` Jimmy PERCHET
2013-10-21 18:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-21 18:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-22 13:33 ` Giuseppe CAVALLARO
2013-10-16 15:24 ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] net:stmmac: fix jumbo frame handling Jimmy Perchet
2013-10-21 13:40 ` Giuseppe CAVALLARO
2013-10-21 16:28 ` Jimmy PERCHET
2013-10-22 13:24 ` Giuseppe CAVALLARO
2013-10-16 15:24 ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] net:stmmac: asynchronous tx_clean Jimmy Perchet
2013-10-21 13:52 ` Giuseppe CAVALLARO
2013-10-21 16:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-21 18:05 ` Jimmy PERCHET
2013-10-21 18:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-10-16 20:37 ` Giuseppe CAVALLARO [this message]
2013-10-18 16:24 ` [PATCH RFC 0/5] net:stmmac: fix jumbo frames handling and optimisation Jimmy PERCHET
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525EF8FF.2010206@st.com \
--to=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=jimmy.perchet@parrot.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).