From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] bonding: patchset for rcu use in bonding
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:08:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52688F33.30904@huawei.com> (raw)
Hi:
The slave list will add and del by bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink(),
which will call call_netdevice_notifiers(), even it is safe to call it in write bond lock now,
but we can't sure that whether it is safe later, because other drivers may deal NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER
in sleep way, so I didn't admit move the bond_upper_dev_unlink() in write bond lock.
now the bond_for_each_slave only protect by rtnl_lock(), maybe use bond_for_each_slave_rcu is a good
way to protect slave list for bond, but as a system slow path, it is no need to transform bond_for_each_slave()
to bond_for_each_slave_rcu() in slow path, so in the patchset, I will remove the unused read bond lock
for monitor function, maybe it is a better way, I will wait to accept any relay for it.
Thanks for the Veaceslav Falico opinion.
v2: add and modify commit for patchset and patch, it will be the first step for the whole patchset.
Ding Tianhong (5):
bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_mii_monitor()
bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_alb_monitor()
bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_loadbalance_arp_mon()
bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_activebackup_arp_mon()
bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_3ad_state_machine_handler()
drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 9 ++--
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 20 ++------
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 100 +++++++++++++---------------------------
3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
--
1.8.2.1
next reply other threads:[~2013-10-24 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-24 3:08 Ding Tianhong [this message]
2013-10-24 9:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] bonding: patchset for rcu use in bonding Veaceslav Falico
2013-10-27 20:37 ` David Miller
2013-10-27 21:10 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-10-27 21:44 ` David Miller
2013-10-27 22:10 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-10-28 4:00 ` David Miller
2013-10-27 22:53 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-10-28 1:15 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-10-28 1:34 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-10-28 3:02 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-10-28 4:01 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52688F33.30904@huawei.com \
--to=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@redhat.com \
--cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).