From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/9] bonding: use RTNL instead of bond lock for bond_3ad_state_machine_handler()
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:53:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5279E74C.8070403@huawei.com> (raw)
The bond_3ad_state_machine_handler() is a slow path, it use the bond
lock to protect the bond slave list and slave port, the slave list
could not be protect by bond lock anymore, so I need to use RTNL or
RCU instead of bond lock, but if I remove the bond lock, the
bond_3ad_state_machine_handler() may use the slave port when bond
releasing the slave, it will occur problems.
As the bond_3ad_unbind_slave() only protected by bond lock or RTNL,
so add RCU is not a good solution as it could not protect the slave
port, so RTNL is fit here.
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
index 187b1b7..a4d190e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
@@ -2068,18 +2068,19 @@ void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct work_struct *work)
struct slave *slave;
struct port *port;
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
+ if (!rtnl_trylock()) {
+ queue_delayed_work(bond->wq, &bond->ad_work, ad_delta_in_ticks);
+ return;
+ }
- //check if there are any slaves
if (!bond_has_slaves(bond))
goto re_arm;
- // check if agg_select_timer timer after initialize is timed out
+ /* check if agg_select_timer timer after initialize is timed out */
if (BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer && !(--BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer)) {
slave = bond_first_slave(bond);
port = slave ? &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port) : NULL;
- // select the active aggregator for the bond
if (port) {
if (!port->slave) {
pr_warning("%s: Warning: bond's first port is uninitialized\n",
@@ -2093,7 +2094,6 @@ void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct work_struct *work)
bond_3ad_set_carrier(bond);
}
- // for each port run the state machines
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
port = &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port);
if (!port->slave) {
@@ -2114,7 +2114,7 @@ void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct work_struct *work)
ad_mux_machine(port);
ad_tx_machine(port);
- // turn off the BEGIN bit, since we already handled it
+ /* turn off the BEGIN bit, since we already handled it */
if (port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_BEGIN)
port->sm_vars &= ~AD_PORT_BEGIN;
@@ -2122,9 +2122,8 @@ void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct work_struct *work)
}
re_arm:
+ rtnl_unlock();
queue_delayed_work(bond->wq, &bond->ad_work, ad_delta_in_ticks);
-
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
}
/**
--
1.8.2.1
next reply other threads:[~2013-11-06 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-06 6:53 Ding Tianhong [this message]
2013-11-06 23:50 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] bonding: use RTNL instead of bond lock for bond_3ad_state_machine_handler() Sergei Shtylyov
2013-11-07 1:40 ` Ding Tianhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5279E74C.8070403@huawei.com \
--to=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@redhat.com \
--cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox