netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, andy@greyhouse.net,
	vfalico@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] bonding: extend round-robin mode
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:51:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <527A81AE.2070400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23278.1383756949@death.nxdomain>

On 11/06/2013 05:55 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> This small patchset adds a new option called packets_per_slave to the
>> bonding which aims to extend round-robin mode with the following effects:
>> 0 - choose the slave id at random
>> 1 - packet per slave (standard round-robin, default option value)
>>> 1 - transmit >1 packets per slave, switch the slaves in round-robin
>> Patch02 adds a description for the new option to the bonding documentation.
> 
> 	Could you explain why this is useful?  My guess is that you're
> trying to synchronize with the packet receive processing of a peer
> (perhaps for GRO?), but I think it would be useful to explain the
> utility of this.
> 
> 	-J
> 
> ---
> 	-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com
> 
Hi Jay,
Yes, that is one good use case, I'm also experimenting with a user-space
software that uses various heuristics and tunes this option (e.g., TCP-RR
case). I've been playing with this option for the past 3 weeks or so and
have to move on to some real-world tests, since my current environment
consists only of VMs and that's nowhere near the real world :-)
If your intention is to include such information in the bonding
documentation then I'll need some more time to gather it, and can do it as
either a follow-up or we can just drop this now and I'll re-post once I've
some definite real(lab)-world results.

Nik

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-06 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-05 12:51 [PATCH net-next 0/2] bonding: extend round-robin mode Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-11-05 12:51 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] bonding: extend round-robin mode with packets_per_slave Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-11-06 13:47   ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-11-05 12:51 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] bonding: document the new packets_per_slave option Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-11-06 16:55 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] bonding: extend round-robin mode Jay Vosburgh
2013-11-06 17:51   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2013-11-07 20:12 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=527A81AE.2070400@redhat.com \
    --to=nikolay@redhat.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).