From: Mathias Krause <mathias.krause@secunet.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Dmitry Tarnyagin <dmitry.tarnyagin@lockless.no>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: allow to leave the buffer fragmented in skb_cow_data()
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 11:01:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527B64E6.9040004@secunet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131107090135.GA385@gondor.apana.org.au>
On 07.11.2013 10:01, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:55:34AM +0100, Mathias Krause wrote:
>> Indeed. I want to avoid the costly memcpy() on the CPU serving the NIC
>> interrupt, as that is a bottleneck in my setup. The packet processing --
>> encrypting/decrypting of ESP packets -- gets mostly parallelized via
>> pcrypt, so that's fine. But the initial network processing, i.e. getting
>> to pcrypt, is what's throttling the throughput currently. (RPS only
>> partly solves this problem as for the ESP receive path most traffic ends
>> up on the same flow).
>
> How about this: instead of doing in-place encryption/decryption
> let's allocate a new destination buffer and encrypt/decrypt into
> it. Then we essentially get the copy for free.
>
> So instead of modifying skb_cow_data you can change esp4.c, etc.
That might be another option. But I fear it might affect performance due
to caching or NUMA effects. :/
I'll think about it and will try to investigate both approaches.
Thanks,
Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-07 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 13:54 [PATCH net-next 0/3] IPsec improvements Mathias Krause
2013-11-05 13:54 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: move pskb_put() to core code Mathias Krause
2013-11-05 18:33 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-11-06 9:01 ` Mathias Krause
2013-11-05 13:54 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] caif: use pskb_put() instead of reimplementing its functionality Mathias Krause
2013-11-05 13:54 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: allow to leave the buffer fragmented in skb_cow_data() Mathias Krause
2013-11-05 14:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-05 14:43 ` Mathias Krause
2013-11-06 9:30 ` Herbert Xu
2013-11-06 9:49 ` Mathias Krause
2013-11-06 9:52 ` Herbert Xu
2013-11-06 12:42 ` Mathias Krause
2013-11-06 12:48 ` Herbert Xu
2013-11-06 16:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-07 8:56 ` Mathias Krause
2013-11-07 8:55 ` Mathias Krause
2013-11-07 9:01 ` Herbert Xu
2013-11-07 10:01 ` Mathias Krause [this message]
2013-11-06 4:48 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] IPsec improvements David Miller
2013-11-06 9:02 ` Mathias Krause
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527B64E6.9040004@secunet.com \
--to=mathias.krause@secunet.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmitry.tarnyagin@lockless.no \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).