netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Chang Xiangzhong <changxiangzhong@gmail.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dreibh@simula.no, ernstgr@simula.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sctp: recover a tranport when an ack comes
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:00:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5286291A.7060507@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131115123055.GA29877@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>

On 11/15/2013 07:30 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:34:55PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> On 11/14/2013 03:40 PM, Chang Xiangzhong wrote:
>>> Expected Behavior:
>>> When hearing an ack from a tranport/path, set its state to normal/on if it's
>>> in abnormal(__partial_failure__ or inactive) state.
>>>
>>> state machine of tranport->state
>>> Whenever a T3_RTX timer expires, then transport->error_count++.
>>> When (association->pf_retrans < transport->error_count < tranport->pathmaxrtx)
>>> 	transport->state = SCTP_PF //partial failure
>>>
>>> When a heartbeat-ack comes or conventional ack acknowledged its availability,
>>> 	transport->state = SCTP_ON
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chang Xiangzhong <changxiangzhong@gmail.com>
>>> Fixes: 5aa93bcf66f ("sctp: Implement quick failover draft from tsvwg")
>>
>> I don't think this is right.  The spec states:
>>   8.  ACKs for retransmissions do not transition a PF destination back
>>         to Active state, since a sender cannot disambiguate whether the
>>         ack was for the original transmission or the retransmission(s).
>>
>>
>> Now, the proper way to this would would be modify
>> sctp_assoc_control_transport() to transition the transport state to
>> ACTIVE if it was PF transport that was chosen to send data.
>>
>> -vlad
>>
> I agree, this patch doesn't agree with the spec, the only time we transition
> from PF to ACTIVE should be on receipt of ack of new data.

You mean HB ACK, right?  The 02 spec that see on the ietf site doesn't
mention anything about transition on SACKs.  Also, there is no way to
tell right now if the ack is for new or retransmitted data.  We could
mark chunks that are retransmitted though.

>  I'm not even sure if
> we should allow PF transports to be selected to send new data.  Currently a
> potentially failed transport will get ignored when specified, and the stack will
> use the active path in its place.  Only if all transports are PF will a PF
> transport be chosen.

Not even that :(.  If all transports are PF, we are going to camp on
the primary path instead of choosing a PF transport with the lowest
error count.

-vlad

> Neil
>
>>> ---
>>>   net/sctp/outqueue.c |    1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
>>> index 94df758..2557fa5 100644
>>> --- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c
>>> +++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
>>> @@ -1517,6 +1517,7 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct sctp_outq *q,
>>>   			 * active if it is not so marked.
>>>   			 */
>>>   			if ((transport->state == SCTP_INACTIVE ||
>>> +			     transport->state == SCTP_PF ||
>>>   			     transport->state == SCTP_UNCONFIRMED) &&
>>>   			    sctp_cmp_addr_exact(&transport->ipaddr, saddr)) {
>>>   				sctp_assoc_control_transport(
>>>
>>
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-15 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-14 20:40 [PATCH] net: sctp: recover a tranport when an ack comes Chang Xiangzhong
2013-11-15  2:34 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-11-15 12:30   ` Neil Horman
2013-11-15 14:00     ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2013-11-15 14:56       ` Neil Horman
2013-11-15 19:59         ` Chang
2013-11-15 20:25           ` Neil Horman
2013-11-15 20:35           ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-11-15 20:38             ` Chang
2013-11-15 22:04   ` Chang
2013-11-15 22:48     ` Vlad Yasevich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5286291A.7060507@gmail.com \
    --to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    --cc=changxiangzhong@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dreibh@simula.no \
    --cc=ernstgr@simula.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).