From: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: how to mix bridges and bonding inc. vlans correctly on Kernel > 3.10
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 22:00:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5287DD07.8000704@profihost.ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5284E137.5010201@gmail.com>
Hi,
sorry for the long delay.
Am 14.11.2013 15:41, schrieb Vlad Yasevich:
> On 11/14/2013 09:29 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> Am 14.11.2013 15:27, schrieb Vlad Yasevich:
>>> On 11/14/2013 06:54 AM, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:09:30PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>>>> Can you try out attached patch please. I ran it in my environment and
>>>>> always get promisc link when attaching devices to the bridge.
>>>>
>>>> It's interesting, actually, why do we need to check for IFF_UP at all
>>>> when
>>>> changing flags.
>>>>
>>>> The addition of IFF_UP goes up to:
>>>>
>>>> commit b6c40d68ff6498b7f63ddf97cf0aa818d748dee7
>>>> Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
>>>> Date: Tue Oct 7 15:26:48 2008 -0700
>>>>
>>>> net: only invoke dev->change_rx_flags when device is UP
>>>>
>>>> Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk> reported a bug when
>>>> setting a
>>>> VLAN
>>>> device down that is in promiscous mode:
>>>>
>>>> When the VLAN device is set down, the promiscous count on the
>>>> real
>>>> device is decremented by one by vlan_dev_stop(). When removing
>>>> the
>>>> promiscous flag from the VLAN device afterwards, the promiscous
>>>> count on the real device is decremented a second time by the
>>>> vlan_change_rx_flags() callback.
>>>>
>>>> ... snip ...
>>>>
>>>
>>> This was applied in 2.6.27 timeframe.
>>>
>>>> However, I'm not sure that this is still needed, cause:
>>>>
>>>> commit deede2fabe24e00bd7e246eb81cd5767dc6fcfc7
>>>> Author: Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl>
>>>> Date: Mon Oct 31 04:53:13 2011 +0000
>>>>
>>>> vlan: Don't propagate flag changes on down interfaces.
>>>>
>>>> When (de)configuring a vlan interface, the IFF_ALLMULTI ans
>>>> IFF_PROMISC
>>>> flags are cleared or set on the underlying interface. So, if
>>>> these
>>>> flags
>>>> are changed on a vlan interface that is not up, the flags
>>>> underlying
>>>> interface might be set or cleared twice.
>>>>
>>>> Only propagating flag changes when a device is up makes sure this
>>>> does
>>>> not happen. It also makes sure that an underlying device is not
>>>> set to
>>>> promiscuous or allmulti mode for a vlan device that is down.
>>>>
>>>> ... snip ...
>>>>
>>>
>>> And this in 3.2. So how did this work for Stefan in 3.9? Unless there
>>> is something in Ubuntu that changed how the stacked interfaces are
>>> configured and is keeping interfaces down longer then it used to.
>>
>> Stop here ;-) in 3.9 it was the other way round.
>>
>> This one worked:
>>> eth2
>>> \
>>> -- bond1 -- vmbr1
>>> / \
>>> eth3 \ vmbr1.3000
>>> \ ---- tap114i1
>>
>
> How are you attaching tap to the vlan device? Or is it attached to
> vmbr1?
No, to vmbr1.3000.
>> this one did not:
>>> eth2
>>> \
>>> -- bond1 -- vmbr1
>>> / \
>>> eth3 ----- bond1.3000 --- vmbr1v3000
>>> \ ---- tap114i1
>>
>> Now with the patch - the 2nd one works the first one does not.
>
> Ok, in this case, you have a VLAN (bond1.3000) configured on top of
> bond interface. That vlan is then attached to the bridge (vmbr1v3000).
> The tap interface for your VM (tap114i1) is also attached to the same
> bridge. In this case, VM will receive only traffic for VLAN 3000 and
> it we receive it untagged.
Yes and this is also what i want to archieve.
> I guess I'd like to understand what you are trying to achieve.
>
> Thanks working with us on this.
> -vlad
>
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>>>> which fixed completely the initial issue with vlans.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we should just remove the IFF_UP check in dev_change_rx_flags(),
>>>> and
>>>> let the drivers using it handle its own logic, as vlan does?
>>>>
>>>
>>> This should work, but this might regress a few drivers. Looking through
>>> the callers of dev_set_promiscuity at least DSA driver suffers
>>> the same fate as VLAN.
>>>
>>> -vlad
>>>
>>>> Something like this:
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>>>> index 8ffc52e..9615cd7 100644
>>>> --- a/net/core/dev.c
>>>> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
>>>> @@ -4995,7 +4995,7 @@ static void dev_change_rx_flags(struct net_device
>>>> *dev, int flags)
>>>> {
>>>> const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
>>>>
>>>> - if ((dev->flags & IFF_UP) && ops->ndo_change_rx_flags)
>>>> + if (ops->ndo_change_rx_flags)
>>>> ops->ndo_change_rx_flags(dev, flags);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -vlad
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-16 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-13 13:58 how to mix bridges and bonding inc. vlans correctly on Kernel > 3.10 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-11-13 14:12 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-11-13 14:20 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-11-13 14:34 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-11-13 14:43 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-11-13 15:05 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-11-13 15:17 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-11-13 16:21 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-11-13 16:43 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-11-13 17:21 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-11-13 20:09 ` Stefan Priebe
2013-11-14 3:09 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-11-14 7:47 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-11-14 12:29 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-11-14 21:13 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-11-16 21:02 ` Stefan Priebe
2013-11-17 3:41 ` Vladislav Yasevich
2013-11-18 7:37 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-11-14 11:54 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-11-14 14:27 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-11-14 14:29 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-11-14 14:41 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-11-16 21:00 ` Stefan Priebe [this message]
2013-11-13 16:44 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-11-13 17:22 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-11-13 17:37 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-11-13 17:46 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2013-11-13 17:49 ` Vlad Yasevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5287DD07.8000704@profihost.ag \
--to=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).