From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikolay Aleksandrov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] bonding: L2DA mode added Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:37:59 +0100 Message-ID: <528E28D7.4010306@redhat.com> References: <1385045738-29726-1-git-send-email-Anton.Nayshtut@wilocity.com> <1385045738-29726-2-git-send-email-Anton.Nayshtut@wilocity.com> <1385047978.10637.51.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jay Vosburgh , Veaceslav Falico , Andy Gospodarek , "David S. Miller" , Cong Wang , Nicolas Schichan , Eric Dumazet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Erez Kirshenbaum , Boris Lapshin To: Eric Dumazet , Anton Nayshtut Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1385047978.10637.51.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 11/21/2013 04:32 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 16:55 +0200, Anton Nayshtut wrote: >> This patches introduces L2DA bonding module with all the data structures and >> interfaces. It's not integrated yet. > > I veto any kind of new bonding mode not using RCU. > > Adding another rwlock in 2013 is simply not an option. > > Thanks > > +1 Also, I haven't read the patch-set closely but based on the description in the first patch I think you can already get this (or very similar) functionality by using the slave override option in the bonding. You can match the destination L2 address and override the slave based on that. Nik