* [PATCH net-next] tun: spelling fixes
@ 2013-12-06 4:42 Stephen Hemminger
2013-12-06 4:46 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2013-12-06 4:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: netdev
Fix spelling errors in tun driver.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c 2013-12-05 14:47:25.820499591 -0800
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c 2013-12-05 14:55:37.032476288 -0800
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ struct tap_filter {
unsigned char addr[FLT_EXACT_COUNT][ETH_ALEN];
};
-/* DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_RSS_QUEUES were choosed to let the rx/tx queues allocated for
+/* DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_RSS_QUEUES were chosen to let the rx/tx queues allocated for
* the netdevice to be fit in one page. So we can make sure the success of
* memory allocation. TODO: increase the limit. */
#define MAX_TAP_QUEUES DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_RSS_QUEUES
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ struct tap_filter {
#define TUN_FLOW_EXPIRE (3 * HZ)
/* A tun_file connects an open character device to a tuntap netdevice. It
- * also contains all socket related strctures (except sock_fprog and tap_filter)
+ * also contains all socket related structures (except sock_fprog and tap_filter)
* to serve as one transmit queue for tuntap device. The sock_fprog and
* tap_filter were kept in tun_struct since they were used for filtering for the
* netdevice not for a specific queue (at least I didn't see the requirement for
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ unlock:
}
/* We try to identify a flow through its rxhash first. The reason that
- * we do not check rxq no. is becuase some cards(e.g 82599), chooses
+ * we do not check rxq no. is because some cards(e.g 82599), chooses
* the rxq based on the txq where the last packet of the flow comes. As
* the userspace application move between processors, we may get a
* different rxq no. here. If we could not get rxhash, then we would
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct
err = 0;
- /* Re-attach the filter to presist device */
+ /* Re-attach the filter to persist device */
if (!skip_filter && (tun->filter_attached == true)) {
err = sk_attach_filter(&tun->fprog, tfile->socket.sk);
if (!err)
@@ -819,9 +819,9 @@ static void tun_poll_controller(struct n
* Tun only receives frames when:
* 1) the char device endpoint gets data from user space
* 2) the tun socket gets a sendmsg call from user space
- * Since both of those are syncronous operations, we are guaranteed
+ * Since both of those are synchronous operations, we are guaranteed
* never to have pending data when we poll for it
- * so theres nothing to do here but return.
+ * so there is nothing to do here but return.
* We need this though so netpoll recognizes us as an interface that
* supports polling, which enables bridge devices in virt setups to
* still use netconsole
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next] tun: spelling fixes
2013-12-06 4:42 [PATCH net-next] tun: spelling fixes Stephen Hemminger
@ 2013-12-06 4:46 ` Jason Wang
2013-12-06 17:51 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2013-12-06 4:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger, David Miller; +Cc: netdev
On 12/06/2013 12:42 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Fix spelling errors in tun driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>
>
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c 2013-12-05 14:47:25.820499591 -0800
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c 2013-12-05 14:55:37.032476288 -0800
> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ struct tap_filter {
> unsigned char addr[FLT_EXACT_COUNT][ETH_ALEN];
> };
>
> -/* DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_RSS_QUEUES were choosed to let the rx/tx queues allocated for
> +/* DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_RSS_QUEUES were chosen to let the rx/tx queues allocated for
> * the netdevice to be fit in one page. So we can make sure the success of
> * memory allocation. TODO: increase the limit. */
> #define MAX_TAP_QUEUES DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_RSS_QUEUES
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ struct tap_filter {
> #define TUN_FLOW_EXPIRE (3 * HZ)
>
> /* A tun_file connects an open character device to a tuntap netdevice. It
> - * also contains all socket related strctures (except sock_fprog and tap_filter)
> + * also contains all socket related structures (except sock_fprog and tap_filter)
> * to serve as one transmit queue for tuntap device. The sock_fprog and
> * tap_filter were kept in tun_struct since they were used for filtering for the
> * netdevice not for a specific queue (at least I didn't see the requirement for
> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ unlock:
> }
>
> /* We try to identify a flow through its rxhash first. The reason that
> - * we do not check rxq no. is becuase some cards(e.g 82599), chooses
> + * we do not check rxq no. is because some cards(e.g 82599), chooses
> * the rxq based on the txq where the last packet of the flow comes. As
> * the userspace application move between processors, we may get a
> * different rxq no. here. If we could not get rxhash, then we would
> @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct
>
> err = 0;
>
> - /* Re-attach the filter to presist device */
> + /* Re-attach the filter to persist device */
> if (!skip_filter && (tun->filter_attached == true)) {
> err = sk_attach_filter(&tun->fprog, tfile->socket.sk);
> if (!err)
> @@ -819,9 +819,9 @@ static void tun_poll_controller(struct n
> * Tun only receives frames when:
> * 1) the char device endpoint gets data from user space
> * 2) the tun socket gets a sendmsg call from user space
> - * Since both of those are syncronous operations, we are guaranteed
> + * Since both of those are synchronous operations, we are guaranteed
> * never to have pending data when we poll for it
> - * so theres nothing to do here but return.
> + * so there is nothing to do here but return.
> * We need this though so netpoll recognizes us as an interface that
> * supports polling, which enables bridge devices in virt setups to
> * still use netconsole
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-06 17:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-06 4:42 [PATCH net-next] tun: spelling fixes Stephen Hemminger
2013-12-06 4:46 ` Jason Wang
2013-12-06 17:51 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).