From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@huawei.com>
Cc: jon.maloy@ericsson.com, allan.stephens@windriver.com,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] tipc: add link_kfree_skbuff helper function
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:09:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A19433.50903@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386311022-11176-2-git-send-email-wangweidong1@huawei.com>
On 12/06/2013 07:23 AM, Wang Weidong wrote:
> replaces some chunks of code that kfree the sk_buff.
> This is just code simplification, no functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@huawei.com>
> ---
> net/tipc/link.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
> index 69cd9bf..1c27d7b 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/link.c
> +++ b/net/tipc/link.c
> @@ -100,6 +100,17 @@ static unsigned int align(unsigned int i)
> return (i + 3) & ~3u;
> }
>
> +static void link_kfree_skbuff(struct sk_buff *buf)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *next;
> +
> + while (buf) {
> + next = buf->next;
> + kfree_skb(buf);
> + buf = next;
> + }
> +}
So kfree_skb_list() does not work for you ?
Also, in case we do not have such generic functions, they should
go to skbuff.c instead ...
> static void link_init_max_pkt(struct tipc_link *l_ptr)
> {
> u32 max_pkt;
> @@ -387,13 +398,8 @@ exit:
> static void link_release_outqueue(struct tipc_link *l_ptr)
> {
> struct sk_buff *buf = l_ptr->first_out;
> - struct sk_buff *next;
>
> - while (buf) {
> - next = buf->next;
> - kfree_skb(buf);
> - buf = next;
> - }
> + link_kfree_skbuff(buf);
> l_ptr->first_out = NULL;
> l_ptr->out_queue_size = 0;
> }
> @@ -416,21 +422,12 @@ void tipc_link_reset_fragments(struct tipc_link *l_ptr)
> void tipc_link_stop(struct tipc_link *l_ptr)
> {
> struct sk_buff *buf;
> - struct sk_buff *next;
>
> buf = l_ptr->oldest_deferred_in;
> - while (buf) {
> - next = buf->next;
> - kfree_skb(buf);
> - buf = next;
> - }
> + link_kfree_skbuff(buf);
>
> buf = l_ptr->first_out;
> - while (buf) {
> - next = buf->next;
> - kfree_skb(buf);
> - buf = next;
> - }
> + link_kfree_skbuff(buf);
>
> tipc_link_reset_fragments(l_ptr);
>
> @@ -472,11 +469,7 @@ void tipc_link_reset(struct tipc_link *l_ptr)
> kfree_skb(l_ptr->proto_msg_queue);
> l_ptr->proto_msg_queue = NULL;
> buf = l_ptr->oldest_deferred_in;
> - while (buf) {
> - struct sk_buff *next = buf->next;
> - kfree_skb(buf);
> - buf = next;
> - }
> + link_kfree_skbuff(buf);
> if (!list_empty(&l_ptr->waiting_ports))
> tipc_link_wakeup_ports(l_ptr, 1);
>
> @@ -1127,10 +1120,7 @@ again:
> if (copy_from_user(buf->data + fragm_crs, sect_crs, sz)) {
> res = -EFAULT;
> error:
> - for (; buf_chain; buf_chain = buf) {
> - buf = buf_chain->next;
> - kfree_skb(buf_chain);
> - }
> + link_kfree_skbuff(buf_chain);
> return res;
> }
> sect_crs += sz;
> @@ -1180,18 +1170,12 @@ error:
> if (l_ptr->max_pkt < max_pkt) {
> sender->max_pkt = l_ptr->max_pkt;
> tipc_node_unlock(node);
> - for (; buf_chain; buf_chain = buf) {
> - buf = buf_chain->next;
> - kfree_skb(buf_chain);
> - }
> + link_kfree_skbuff(buf_chain);
> goto again;
> }
> } else {
> reject:
> - for (; buf_chain; buf_chain = buf) {
> - buf = buf_chain->next;
> - kfree_skb(buf_chain);
> - }
> + link_kfree_skbuff(buf_chain);
> return tipc_port_reject_sections(sender, hdr, msg_sect,
> len, TIPC_ERR_NO_NODE);
> }
> @@ -2306,11 +2290,7 @@ static int link_send_long_buf(struct tipc_link *l_ptr, struct sk_buff *buf)
> fragm = tipc_buf_acquire(fragm_sz + INT_H_SIZE);
> if (fragm == NULL) {
> kfree_skb(buf);
> - while (buf_chain) {
> - buf = buf_chain;
> - buf_chain = buf_chain->next;
> - kfree_skb(buf);
> - }
> + link_kfree_skbuff(buf_chain);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> msg_set_size(&fragm_hdr, fragm_sz + INT_H_SIZE);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-06 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-06 6:23 [PATCH net-next 0/6] tipc: do some clean ups Wang Weidong
2013-12-06 6:23 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] tipc: add link_kfree_skbuff helper function Wang Weidong
2013-12-06 6:34 ` Ying Xue
2013-12-06 6:42 ` Wang Weidong
2013-12-06 14:13 ` Jon Maloy
2013-12-07 4:52 ` Wang Weidong
2013-12-06 6:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-12-06 9:09 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2013-12-06 9:16 ` Wang Weidong
2013-12-06 6:23 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] tipc: remove the unnecessary variable Wang Weidong
2013-12-06 6:23 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] tipc: use a same goto path Wang Weidong
2013-12-06 6:23 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] tipc: Use <linux/uaccess.h> instead of <asm/uaccess.h> Wang Weidong
2013-12-06 6:23 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] tipc: change lock_sock order in connect() Wang Weidong
2013-12-06 6:23 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] tipc: separate the check nseq and sseq allocate failed Wang Weidong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A19433.50903@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=allan.stephens@windriver.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=wangweidong1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).