From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wang Weidong Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] unix: convert printks to pr_ Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 17:32:02 +0800 Message-ID: <52A19992.10803@huawei.com> References: <52A16A19.60001@huawei.com> <52A19766.5030308@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , , , , , To: Daniel Borkmann Return-path: Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:43855 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754090Ab3LFJe3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 04:34:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <52A19766.5030308@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2013/12/6 17:22, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 12/06/2013 07:09 AM, Wang Weidong wrote: >> use pr_ instead of printk(LEVEL) >> >> Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong >> --- >> net/unix/af_unix.c | 10 ++++++---- >> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c >> index 4155ed3..ca98e61 100644 >> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c >> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c >> @@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ >> * with BSD names. >> */ >> >> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt >> +#define DEBUG >> + > > Why do you define DEBUG here ? > I think the pr_debug != printk(KERN_DEBUG), equal when define DEBUG. Regards. Wang >> #include >> #include >> #include >> @@ -366,7 +369,7 @@ static void unix_sock_destructor(struct sock *sk) >> WARN_ON(!sk_unhashed(sk)); >> WARN_ON(sk->sk_socket); >> if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) { >> - printk(KERN_INFO "Attempt to release alive unix socket: %p\n", sk); >> + pr_info("Attempt to release alive unix socket: %p\n", sk); >> return; >> } >> >> @@ -378,7 +381,7 @@ static void unix_sock_destructor(struct sock *sk) >> sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, -1); >> local_bh_enable(); >> #ifdef UNIX_REFCNT_DEBUG >> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "UNIX %p is destroyed, %ld are still alive.\n", sk, >> + pr_debug("UNIX %p is destroyed, %ld are still alive.\n", sk, >> atomic_long_read(&unix_nr_socks)); >> #endif >> } >> @@ -2434,8 +2437,7 @@ static int __init af_unix_init(void) >> >> rc = proto_register(&unix_proto, 1); >> if (rc != 0) { >> - printk(KERN_CRIT "%s: Cannot create unix_sock SLAB cache!\n", >> - __func__); >> + pr_crit("%s: Cannot create unix_sock SLAB cache!\n", __func__); >> goto out; >> } >> >> > > . >