From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, <brouer@redhat.com>,
<jpirko@redhat.com>, <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v6 1/2] net: sched: tbf: fix the calculation of max_size
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:21:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A5B5D9.7000204@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B7471@saturn3.aculab.com>
On 2013/12/9 18:07, David Laight wrote:
>> From: Yang Yingliang
>> On 2013/12/6 18:56, David Laight wrote:
>>>> From: Yang Yingliang
>>> ...
>>>
>>> You are multiplying two values then dividing by 10**9
>>> I'd guess that the intermediate value might exceed 2**64.
>>>
>>>> + if (unlikely(r->linklayer == TC_LINKLAYER_ATM))
>>>> + len = (len / 53) * 48;
>>>
>>> You probably want to do the multiply first.
>>> But why not scale rate_bytes_ps instead.
>>>
>>
>> When the linklayer is ATM, the formula to calculate tokens is:
>>
>> ((u64)(DIV_ROUND_UP(len,48)*53) * r->mult) >> r->shift
>>
>> So, I scale len here.
>
> Seems to me that there are a lot of unnecessary multiplies and
> divides going on here.
> Looks to me like the code was originally written to require one
> multiply and one shift for each packet.
The way to calc tokens in psched_l2t_ns() means:
we got a payload which length is 'len'. To get the actual size we
need send, round len up to a multiple of 53. After getting the
size, we do multiply and shift to calculate tokens that we need.
>
> In any case the latter code is allowing for more of the ATM cell
> overhead. I'm not at all sure the intent is to remove that when
> setting up the constants.
>
> OTOH should this code be worrying about the packet overheads at all?
> Does it add in the ethernet pre-emable, CRC and inter packet gap?
This overhead is sent from userspace by tc.
>
> I'd guess that the most the ATM code should do it round the length
> up to a multiple of 48 (user payload in a cell).
53 is ATM cell size include header, sending a header needs tokens as
well. I'd guess round the length up to a multiple of 53 in psched_l2t_ns()
is necessary.
Regards,
Yang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-09 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-06 7:00 [PATCH net v6 0/2] net: sched: fix two issues Yang Yingliang
2013-12-06 7:00 ` [PATCH net v6 1/2] net: sched: tbf: fix the calculation of max_size Yang Yingliang
2013-12-06 10:56 ` David Laight
2013-12-09 2:26 ` Yang Yingliang
2013-12-09 3:26 ` Yang Yingliang
2013-12-09 10:07 ` David Laight
2013-12-09 12:21 ` Yang Yingliang [this message]
2013-12-09 13:10 ` [PATCH RFC ] " Yang Yingliang
2013-12-09 15:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-12-10 2:29 ` Yang Yingliang
2013-12-10 2:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-12-09 13:11 ` [PATCH net v6 1/2] " David Laight
2013-12-10 2:04 ` Yang Yingliang
2013-12-06 7:00 ` [PATCH net v6 2/2] net: sched: htb: fix the calculation of quantum Yang Yingliang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A5B5D9.7000204@huawei.com \
--to=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jbrouer@redhat.com \
--cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).