From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/20] ppp: slight optimization of addr compare Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:40:46 +0400 Message-ID: <52B9B90E.6040106@cogentembedded.com> References: <52B96FCD.50901@huawei.com> <52B9B559.2060400@cogentembedded.com> <1387902949.2259.51.camel@joe-AO722> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ding Tianhong , Michal Ostrowski , Netdev , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" To: Joe Perches Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:56170 "EHLO mail-la0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752444Ab3LXQkm (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Dec 2013 11:40:42 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id el20so2920299lab.37 for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:40:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1387902949.2259.51.camel@joe-AO722> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello. On 24-12-2013 20:35, Joe Perches wrote: > [] >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c > [] >>> @@ -131,12 +131,13 @@ static inline struct pppoe_net *pppoe_pernet(struct net *net) >>> >>> static inline int cmp_2_addr(struct pppoe_addr *a, struct pppoe_addr *b) >>> { >>> - return a->sid == b->sid && !memcmp(a->remote, b->remote, ETH_ALEN); >>> + return a->sid == b->sid && ether_addr_equal(a->remote, >>> + b->remote); >> If it really doesn't fit insto single line, the continuation line should >> start right under 'a->remote'. > Better still might be > > return a->sid == b->sid && > ether_addr_equal(a->remote, b->remote); Actually, after the second look, I don't know why the line was broken at all. WBR, Sergei