netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next v2 11/20] net: packetengines: slight optimization of addr
@ 2013-12-28  6:17 Ding Tianhong
  2013-12-28 13:58 ` Sergei Shtylyov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ding Tianhong @ 2013-12-28  6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller, Netdev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
to instead of memcmp.

Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
index d28593b..b83ac0e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
@@ -1097,12 +1097,12 @@ static int yellowfin_rx(struct net_device *dev)
 			if (status2 & 0x80) dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
 #ifdef YF_PROTOTYPE		/* Support for prototype hardware errata. */
 		} else if ((yp->flags & HasMACAddrBug)  &&
-			memcmp(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
-				entry*sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
-				dev->dev_addr, 6) != 0 &&
-			memcmp(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
-				entry*sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
-				"\377\377\377\377\377\377", 6) != 0) {
+			!ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
+						      entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
+							  dev->dev_addr) &&
+			!ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
+							  entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
+							  "\377\377\377\377\377\377")) {
 			if (bogus_rx++ == 0)
 				netdev_warn(dev, "Bad frame to %pM\n",
 					    buf_addr);
-- 
1.7.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/20] net: packetengines: slight optimization of addr
  2013-12-28  6:17 [PATCH net-next v2 11/20] net: packetengines: slight optimization of addr Ding Tianhong
@ 2013-12-28 13:58 ` Sergei Shtylyov
  2013-12-28 15:18   ` Ding Tianhong
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2013-12-28 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ding Tianhong, David S. Miller, Netdev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello.

On 28-12-2013 10:17, Ding Tianhong wrote:

> Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
> to instead of memcmp.

> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c |   12 ++++++------
>   1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
> index d28593b..b83ac0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
> @@ -1097,12 +1097,12 @@ static int yellowfin_rx(struct net_device *dev)
>   			if (status2 & 0x80) dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
>   #ifdef YF_PROTOTYPE		/* Support for prototype hardware errata. */
>   		} else if ((yp->flags & HasMACAddrBug)  &&
> -			memcmp(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
> -				entry*sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
> -				dev->dev_addr, 6) != 0 &&
> -			memcmp(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
> -				entry*sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
> -				"\377\377\377\377\377\377", 6) != 0) {
> +			!ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
> +						      entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
> +							  dev->dev_addr) &&

    Previous line was aligned correctly, the above line should start under 
le32_to_cpu.

> +			!ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
> +							  entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),

    Start the continuation lines under 'yp', please.

> +							  "\377\377\377\377\377\377")) {

    This line should start under le32_to_cpu.

WBR, Sergei

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/20] net: packetengines: slight optimization of addr
  2013-12-28 13:58 ` Sergei Shtylyov
@ 2013-12-28 15:18   ` Ding Tianhong
  2013-12-28 17:23     ` Joe Perches
  2013-12-28 23:25     ` Sergei Shtylyov
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ding Tianhong @ 2013-12-28 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sergei Shtylyov, Ding Tianhong, David S. Miller, Netdev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

于 2013/12/28 21:58, Sergei Shtylyov 写道:
> Hello.
> 
> On 28-12-2013 10:17, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> 
>> Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
>> to instead of memcmp.
> 
>> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c |   12 ++++++------
>>   1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
>> index d28593b..b83ac0e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
>> @@ -1097,12 +1097,12 @@ static int yellowfin_rx(struct net_device *dev)
>>               if (status2 & 0x80) dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
>>   #ifdef YF_PROTOTYPE        /* Support for prototype hardware errata. */
>>           } else if ((yp->flags & HasMACAddrBug)  &&
>> -            memcmp(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
>> -                entry*sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
>> -                dev->dev_addr, 6) != 0 &&
>> -            memcmp(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
>> -                entry*sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
>> -                "\377\377\377\377\377\377", 6) != 0) {
>> +            !ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
>> +                              entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
>> +                              dev->dev_addr) &&
> 
>    Previous line was aligned correctly, the above line should start under le32_to_cpu.
> 
>> +            !ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
>> +                              entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
> 
>    Start the continuation lines under 'yp', please.
> 
>> +                              "\377\377\377\377\377\377")) {
> 
>    This line should start under le32_to_cpu.
> 
> WBR, Sergei
> 

Hi sergei:
you mean this way?
	!ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
				      entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
			  dev->dev_addr) &&

	!ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
				      entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
			  "\377\377\377\377\377\377")) {

Regards
Ding

> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/20] net: packetengines: slight optimization of addr
  2013-12-28 15:18   ` Ding Tianhong
@ 2013-12-28 17:23     ` Joe Perches
  2013-12-30  2:39       ` Ding Tianhong
  2013-12-28 23:25     ` Sergei Shtylyov
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2013-12-28 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ding Tianhong
  Cc: Sergei Shtylyov, Ding Tianhong, David S. Miller, Netdev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 23:18 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> 于 2013/12/28 21:58, Sergei Shtylyov 写道:
> > Hello.
> > 
> > On 28-12-2013 10:17, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> > 
> >> Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
> >> to instead of memcmp.
> > 
> >> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c |   12 ++++++------
> >>   1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
> >> index d28593b..b83ac0e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
> >> @@ -1097,12 +1097,12 @@ static int yellowfin_rx(struct net_device *dev)
> >>               if (status2 & 0x80) dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> >>   #ifdef YF_PROTOTYPE        /* Support for prototype hardware errata. */
> >>           } else if ((yp->flags & HasMACAddrBug)  &&
> >> -            memcmp(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
> >> -                entry*sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
> >> -                dev->dev_addr, 6) != 0 &&
> >> -            memcmp(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
> >> -                entry*sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
> >> -                "\377\377\377\377\377\377", 6) != 0) {
> >> +            !ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
> >> +                              entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
> >> +                              dev->dev_addr) &&
> > 
> >    Previous line was aligned correctly, the above line should start under le32_to_cpu.
> > 
> >> +            !ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
> >> +                              entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
> > 
> >    Start the continuation lines under 'yp', please.
> > 
> >> +                              "\377\377\377\377\377\377")) {
> > 
> >    This line should start under le32_to_cpu.
> > 
> > WBR, Sergei
> > 
> 
> Hi sergei:
> you mean this way?
> 	!ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
> 				      entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
> 			  dev->dev_addr) &&
> 
> 	!ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
> 				      entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
> 			  "\377\377\377\377\377\377")) {

Does this really matter?
Does anyone have a packetengine NIC anymore?

\377 octal is 0xff, so this is matching a broadcast address.
is_broadcast_ether_addr(addr) would be appropriate.

So would using a temporary address.

u8 *addr = (u8 *)(unsigned long)le32_to_cpu(etc)

but the whole thing looks very suspect as an le32
value could not be added to correctly on a
big-endian arch anyway.

My guess is this was tested only on an x86 and
it should be:

	u8 *addr = (u8 *)(unsigned long)(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma) +
					 entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc));

It maybe better just to leave these two alone.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/20] net: packetengines: slight optimization of addr
  2013-12-28 15:18   ` Ding Tianhong
  2013-12-28 17:23     ` Joe Perches
@ 2013-12-28 23:25     ` Sergei Shtylyov
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2013-12-28 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ding Tianhong, Ding Tianhong, David S. Miller, Netdev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello.

On 12/28/2013 06:18 PM, Ding Tianhong wrote:

>>> Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
>>> to instead of memcmp.

>>> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c |   12 ++++++------
>>>    1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
>>> index d28593b..b83ac0e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
>>> @@ -1097,12 +1097,12 @@ static int yellowfin_rx(struct net_device *dev)
>>>                if (status2 & 0x80) dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
>>>    #ifdef YF_PROTOTYPE        /* Support for prototype hardware errata. */
>>>            } else if ((yp->flags & HasMACAddrBug)  &&
>>> -            memcmp(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
>>> -                entry*sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
>>> -                dev->dev_addr, 6) != 0 &&
>>> -            memcmp(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
>>> -                entry*sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
>>> -                "\377\377\377\377\377\377", 6) != 0) {
>>> +            !ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
>>> +                              entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
>>> +                              dev->dev_addr) &&

>>     Previous line was aligned correctly, the above line should start under le32_to_cpu.

>>> +            !ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
>>> +                              entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),

>>     Start the continuation lines under 'yp', please.

>>> +                              "\377\377\377\377\377\377")) {

>>     This line should start under le32_to_cpu.

>> WBR, Sergei


> Hi sergei:
> you mean this way?
> 	!ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
> 				      entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
> 			  dev->dev_addr) &&
>
> 	!ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
> 				      entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
> 			  "\377\377\377\377\377\377")) {

    Yes, exactly.

> Regards
> Ding

WBR, Sergei

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/20] net: packetengines: slight optimization of addr
  2013-12-28 17:23     ` Joe Perches
@ 2013-12-30  2:39       ` Ding Tianhong
  2013-12-30  6:05         ` Joe Perches
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ding Tianhong @ 2013-12-30  2:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Perches, Ding Tianhong
  Cc: Sergei Shtylyov, David S. Miller, Netdev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 2013/12/29 1:23, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 23:18 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> 于 2013/12/28 21:58, Sergei Shtylyov 写道:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> On 28-12-2013 10:17, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>>>
>>>> Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
>>>> to instead of memcmp.
>>>
>>>> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c |   12 ++++++------
>>>>   1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
>>>> index d28593b..b83ac0e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/packetengines/yellowfin.c
>>>> @@ -1097,12 +1097,12 @@ static int yellowfin_rx(struct net_device *dev)
>>>>               if (status2 & 0x80) dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
>>>>   #ifdef YF_PROTOTYPE        /* Support for prototype hardware errata. */
>>>>           } else if ((yp->flags & HasMACAddrBug)  &&
>>>> -            memcmp(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
>>>> -                entry*sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
>>>> -                dev->dev_addr, 6) != 0 &&
>>>> -            memcmp(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
>>>> -                entry*sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
>>>> -                "\377\377\377\377\377\377", 6) != 0) {
>>>> +            !ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
>>>> +                              entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
>>>> +                              dev->dev_addr) &&
>>>
>>>    Previous line was aligned correctly, the above line should start under le32_to_cpu.
>>>
>>>> +            !ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
>>>> +                              entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
>>>
>>>    Start the continuation lines under 'yp', please.
>>>
>>>> +                              "\377\377\377\377\377\377")) {
>>>
>>>    This line should start under le32_to_cpu.
>>>
>>> WBR, Sergei
>>>
>>
>> Hi sergei:
>> you mean this way?
>> 	!ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
>> 				      entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
>> 			  dev->dev_addr) &&
>>
>> 	!ether_addr_equal(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma +
>> 				      entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)),
>> 			  "\377\377\377\377\377\377")) {
> 
> Does this really matter?
> Does anyone have a packetengine NIC anymore?
> 
> \377 octal is 0xff, so this is matching a broadcast address.
> is_broadcast_ether_addr(addr) would be appropriate.
> 
> So would using a temporary address.
> 
> u8 *addr = (u8 *)(unsigned long)le32_to_cpu(etc)
> 
> but the whole thing looks very suspect as an le32
> value could not be added to correctly on a
> big-endian arch anyway.
> 
> My guess is this was tested only on an x86 and
> it should be:
> 
> 	u8 *addr = (u8 *)(unsigned long)(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma) +
> 					 entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc));
> 
> It maybe better just to leave these two alone.
> 

Hi Joe:

I don't understand packetengine NIC anymore, But I think the change is clearly,
as your said, the broadcast check is enough here, did you mean that?

	!is_broadcast_ether_addr((u8 *)(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma) +
						    entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)))

Thanks

Regards
Ding

> 
> .
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/20] net: packetengines: slight optimization of addr
  2013-12-30  2:39       ` Ding Tianhong
@ 2013-12-30  6:05         ` Joe Perches
  2013-12-30  6:19           ` Ding Tianhong
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2013-12-30  6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ding Tianhong
  Cc: Ding Tianhong, Sergei Shtylyov, David S. Miller, Netdev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 10:39 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> I don't understand packetengine NIC anymore, But I think the change is clearly,
> as your said, the broadcast check is enough here, did you mean that?
> 
> 	!is_broadcast_ether_addr((u8 *)(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma) +
> 						    entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)))

Not quite.  I meant this could be:

		u8 *addr = (u8 *)(unsigned long)le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma) +
							    entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc);

		if (!ether_addr_equal(addr, dev->dev_addr) &&
		    !is_broadcast_ether_addr(addr)) {
			etc...

but again, I think thus hardly matters and could just as well
be left alone.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/20] net: packetengines: slight optimization of addr
  2013-12-30  6:05         ` Joe Perches
@ 2013-12-30  6:19           ` Ding Tianhong
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ding Tianhong @ 2013-12-30  6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Perches
  Cc: Ding Tianhong, Sergei Shtylyov, David S. Miller, Netdev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 2013/12/30 14:05, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 10:39 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> I don't understand packetengine NIC anymore, But I think the change is clearly,
>> as your said, the broadcast check is enough here, did you mean that?
>>
>> 	!is_broadcast_ether_addr((u8 *)(le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma) +
>> 						    entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc)))
> 
> Not quite.  I meant this could be:
> 
> 		u8 *addr = (u8 *)(unsigned long)le32_to_cpu(yp->rx_ring_dma) +
> 							    entry * sizeof(struct yellowfin_desc);
> 
> 		if (!ether_addr_equal(addr, dev->dev_addr) &&
> 		    !is_broadcast_ether_addr(addr)) {
> 			etc...
> 
> but again, I think thus hardly matters and could just as well
> be left alone.
> 
> 

Ok, I will focus on ether_addr_equal in this patch, anymore will left alone. Thanks

Regards
Ding

> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-30  6:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-28  6:17 [PATCH net-next v2 11/20] net: packetengines: slight optimization of addr Ding Tianhong
2013-12-28 13:58 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-28 15:18   ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-28 17:23     ` Joe Perches
2013-12-30  2:39       ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-30  6:05         ` Joe Perches
2013-12-30  6:19           ` Ding Tianhong
2013-12-28 23:25     ` Sergei Shtylyov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).