From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ding Tianhong Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 1/7] bonding: use ether_addr_equal_unaligned for bond addr compare Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 16:21:20 +0800 Message-ID: <52C52180.2030707@huawei.com> References: <52C4BD16.5010702@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Joe Perches , Jay Vosburgh , Veaceslav Falico , "David S. Miller" , Netdev , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" To: Julia Lawall Return-path: Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.64]:31594 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750800AbaABIWN (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2014 03:22:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2014/1/2 15:39, Julia Lawall wrote: > Are the casts needed Yes, otherwise the warming will report: /net-next/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c:427: warning: passing argument= 1 of =E2=80=98ether_addr_equal_64bits=E2=80=99 from incompatible point= er type Regards Ding