From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Duyck Subject: Re: question about ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:42:30 -0800 Message-ID: <52CC2066.1030303@intel.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Julia Lawall , donald.c.skidmore@intel.com, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:57704 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750933AbaAGPmb (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:42:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: A VF isn't a real device so it shouldn't really have the concept of a power state. The power state for the device is controlled via the PF. I suspect the fact that ixgbevf is modifying power state on resume is likely a bug. Thanks, Alex On 01/07/2014 06:46 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: > I was wondering why ixgbevf_suspend doesn't call pci_set_power_state? It > is called in the corresponding resume function, and most other PCI drivers > with a suspend functyion also call it in suspend. > > thanks, > julia > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >