From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ding Tianhong Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.5 17/19] mwifiex: slight optimization of addr compare Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 10:58:09 +0800 Message-ID: <52CCBEC1.1010309@huawei.com> References: <52BC15E7.7050205@huawei.com> <477F20668A386D41ADCC57781B1F70430F534B5541@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "John W. Linville" , "linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Netdev , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" To: Bing Zhao Return-path: In-Reply-To: <477F20668A386D41ADCC57781B1F70430F534B5541-r8ILAu4/owuHXkj8w7BxOhL4W9x8LtSr@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 2014/1/8 10:50, Bing Zhao wrote: > Hi Ding, > >> Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal >> instead of memcmp. > >> @@ -782,8 +782,7 @@ static int mwifiex_ret_ibss_coalescing_status(struct mwifiex_private *priv, >> } >> >> /* If BSSID is diff, modify current BSS parameters */ >> - if (memcmp(priv->curr_bss_params.bss_descriptor.mac_address, >> - ibss_coal_resp->bssid, ETH_ALEN)) { >> + if (!ether_addr_equal(priv->curr_bss_params.bss_descriptor.mac_address, ibss_coal_resp->bssid)) > > Could you break the line? > If you run "checkpatch.pl" you will spot this warning. > >> if (!IS_11N_ENABLED(priv) || >> - memcmp(priv->curr_addr, rx_pkt_hdr->eth803_hdr.h_dest, ETH_ALEN)) { >> + !ether_addr_equal_unaligned(priv->curr_addr, rx_pkt_hdr->eth803_hdr.h_dest)) { > > Also over 80 characters here. > > Thanks, > Bing > Ok, thanks Regards Ding -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html