netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] b43: Fix oops if firmware is not available
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:21:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D2EB28.2000507@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389500647.3720.51.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>

On 01/11/2014 10:24 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 21:55 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
>> On 01/11/2014 09:27 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 13:48 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
>>>> On openSUSE systems, the script that installs the firmware for b43 also
>>>> unloads and reloads the driver. When the firmware was not previously
>>>> available, the driver has stalled at a wait_for_completion(). When the
>>>> unload routine releases that hold, the driver encounters structures
>>>> that have already been deleted and generates a fatal condition. When
>>>> the user does a manual restart, the file system cleanup frequently
>>>> results in the firmware files being deleted and the user is never able
>>>> to install the firmware. The fix is to change the wait_for_completion()
>>>> with a wait_for_completion_timeout() with a 60 second wait period.
>>>>
>>>> There is a potential race condition; however, the chances that less
>>>> than a minute has elapsed between the initial driver load and a
>>>> subsequent unload is very unlikely.
>>>
>>> A minute-long race is 'unlikely' to be hit?  Seriously?!
>>
>> Ben,
>>
>> If you force a reboot before the minute expires, nothing weird happens. The only
>> race condition happens when the user has to
>
> ...remove the module.  Exactly how the bug reporter triggered module
> removal seems irrelevant.
>
>> log in, open a terminal, run a
>> script that downloads 13.5 MiB of files from the Internet, and then executes the
>> firmware extraction program. On my 10 Mbps external line and a 2 GHz CPU, that
>> takes 32 s, plus any time to enter the password for a sudo operation. That was
>> the basis for my conclusion that a race is unlikely.
>>
>> What is the minimum time that should be allowed for a request_firmware_nowait()
>> to respond? I know we had to go to asynchronous fw loading because the
>> synchronous  version would timeout at 30 s.
>
> You could switch back to synchronous firmware loading soon, as it's not
> going to support a usermode helper any more.
>
> But until then, the proper fix for this is going to be to cancel the
> waiter earlier in teardown.

After closer inspection, it turns out the waiter was never canceled in the 
teardown. I have had to move the completion struct to make it available at 
module exit, but now I have a better fix.

Thanks for the critical review.

Larry

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-12 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-11 19:48 [PATCH 0/3] Fixes for b43 and b43legacy Larry Finger
     [not found] ` <1389469714-13040-1-git-send-email-Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-11 19:48   ` [PATCH 2/3] b43: Fix oops if firmware is not available Larry Finger
2014-01-12  3:27     ` Ben Hutchings
2014-01-12  3:55       ` Larry Finger
2014-01-12  4:24         ` Ben Hutchings
     [not found]           ` <1389500647.3720.51.camel-nDn/Rdv9kqW9Jme8/bJn5UCKIB8iOfG2tUK59QYPAWc@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-12  8:40             ` Johannes Berg
2014-01-12 19:21           ` Larry Finger [this message]
2014-01-11 19:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] b43legacy: " Larry Finger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52D2EB28.2000507@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).