From: annie li <annie.li@oracle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
ian.campbell@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next] xen-netfront: clean up code in xennet_release_rx_bufs
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:17:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D69864.9030207@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52D67677.4050407@citrix.com>
On 2014-1-15 19:52, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 15/01/14 11:42, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:20:49AM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> On 09/01/14 22:48, Annie Li wrote:
>>>> Current netfront only grants pages for grant copy, not for grant transfer, so
>>>> remove corresponding transfer code and add receiving copy code in
>>>> xennet_release_rx_bufs.
>>> While netfront only supports a copying backend, I don't see anything
>>> preventing the backend from retaining mappings to netfront's Rx buffers...
>>>
>> Correct.
>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Annie Li <Annie.li@oracle.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 60 ++-----------------------------------------
>>>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>>>> index e59acb1..692589e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
>>>> @@ -1134,78 +1134,24 @@ static void xennet_release_tx_bufs(struct netfront_info *np)
>>>>
>>>> static void xennet_release_rx_bufs(struct netfront_info *np)
>>>> {
>>> [...]
>>>> - mfn = gnttab_end_foreign_transfer_ref(ref);
>>>> + gnttab_end_foreign_access_ref(ref, 0);
>>> ... the gnttab_end_foreign_access_ref() may then fail and...
>>>
>> Oh, I see. Andrew was actually referencing this function. Yes, it can
>> fail. Since he omitted "_ref" I looked at the other function when I
>> replied to him...
>>
>>>> gnttab_release_grant_reference(&np->gref_rx_head, ref);
>>>> np->grant_rx_ref[id] = GRANT_INVALID_REF;
>>> [...]
>>>> + kfree_skb(skb);
>>> ... this could then potentially free pages that the backend still has
>>> mapped. If the pages are then reused, this would leak information to
>>> the backend.
>>>
>>> Since only a buggy backend would result in this, leaking the skbs and
>>> grant refs would be acceptable here. I would also print an error.
>>>
>> How about using gnttab_end_foreign_access. The deferred queue looks like
>> a right solution -- pending page won't get freed until gref is
>> quiescent.
> This is more like the correct approach but I don't think it still quite
> right. The skb owns the pages so we don't want
> gnttab_end_foreign_access() to free them as freeing the skb will attempt
> to free them again.
>
> Having gnttab_end_foreign_access() do a free just looks odd to me, the
> free isn't paired with any alloc in the grant table code.
>
> It seems more logical to me that granting access takes an additional
> page ref, and then ending access releases that ref.
I am thinking of two ways, and they can be implemented in new patches.
1. If gnttab_end_foreign_access_ref succeeds, then kfree_skb is called
to free skb. Otherwise, using gnttab_end_foreign_access to release ref
and pages.
2. Add a similar deferred way of gnttab_end_foreign_access in
gnttab_end_foreign_access_ref.
Thanks
Annie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-15 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-09 22:48 [Xen-devel][PATCH net-next] xen-netfront: clean up code in xennet_release_rx_bufs Annie Li
2014-01-14 23:28 ` David Miller
2014-01-16 6:04 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH " annie li
2014-01-15 10:07 ` [Xen-devel][PATCH " Wei Liu
2014-01-15 11:02 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH " Andrew Bennieston
2014-01-15 11:14 ` Wei Liu
2014-01-15 14:15 ` annie li
2014-01-15 15:35 ` Andrew Bennieston
2014-01-15 11:20 ` David Vrabel
2014-01-15 11:42 ` Wei Liu
2014-01-15 11:52 ` David Vrabel
2014-01-15 14:17 ` annie li [this message]
2014-01-15 14:32 ` Wei Liu
2014-01-15 15:13 ` David Vrabel
2014-01-16 5:59 ` annie li
2014-01-15 14:16 ` annie li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D69864.9030207@oracle.com \
--to=annie.li@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).